Sunday, November 24, 2013 12:13:43 PM
Pretty clearly a fake story. For one, the article doesn't include WHERE the attack took place. An article failing to include the 4 basic Ws (who what where when) is a pretty big red flag. But, this being the internet, I figured there`s always a chance the article was just paraphrased from a legit news story. Except if that were the case, I should come up with at least one legit hit by Googling the name of the victim in this case, but all that got me was the article in question and other articles questioning its validity. While that`s not conclusive proof this is fake, the article in question is in no way evidence of its own validity, and therefore until I see an article that at least contains information as to where this attack occurred, I`m gonna go ahead and continue assuming that this article is 100% grade A bullplop.
Sunday, November 24, 2013 6:30:05 AM
yawn looks like it was faked. Anywho even if it wasn't fake good riddiance. Why the drat would you punch an old lady? I don`t mind one bit that someone got shot because of that. How the heck would she know if she was going to get killed or not.
Saturday, November 23, 2013 4:36:59 PM
Either it's a pro-gun nut trying to justify carrying a gun or someone trying to spread a rumor that makes these kids think twice about doing it. NIce try but won`t work in this internet world where fake stories can be debunked in a few minutes.