I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Fake cancer study spotlights bogus science reviews

Science trolls!!!!

submitted by: handimanner
< Back Next >
Fake cancer study spotlights bogus science reviews. Science trolls!!!!
+ Add to Favs
View/Add
Hits: 3942 | Favorites: 0 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 1.5 | Category: Science | Date: 10/04/2013
 
 popular today
WTH Was She Looking For? [Gif] `Cause if it was decency, she was denied. [NSFWish]
50 Gorgeous Girls In Glasses [Pix] Every one of these smoking hotties is guaranteed to give you double vision.
When Creepy Obsessions Go Too Far [Pix] One Direction? Try WRONG Direction. (Someone hide the knives!)
Be Glad You Missed This Flight [Pic] I am impressed that it was only delayed 6 minutes.
The Job Interview From Hell [Pic] Trying to get a new job? Then DO NOT follow this guy`s example. Do not pass go, Do not get job, Go directly to jail.
More Comments >

Keggar
Male, 50-59, Western US
 54 Posts
Sunday, October 6, 2013 6:47:35 AM
More "Man made" global warming type junk science surfacing again? I wonder freedoms they will try to take using this theory??? Anyone remember station wagons, 2 cycle motors, working toilets and light bulbs that actually give adequate quality light?

patchgrabber
Male, 30-39, Canada
 5726 Posts
Saturday, October 5, 2013 12:58:16 PM
Meh, a good response by Michael Eisen (who created PLoS One) about how this is not unique to open access journals. Science and Nature also have a fairly high rate of retractions, as they are motivated by "sexy" papers that attract subscriptions. Open access doesn't have that ability, so their focus is more on number of subs. It also didn`t submit this article to *any* subscription journals as a control, so there isn`t really anything one can say about this other than that peer review needs to itself be reviewed.

drawman61
Male, 50-59, Europe
 6188 Posts
Saturday, October 5, 2013 8:40:29 AM
Next they'll be claiming the Earth isn`t flat.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14740 Posts
Friday, October 4, 2013 9:50:06 PM
Someone could make big money with this.

They already are. AGW is a multi $BILLION scam, and a lot of hucksters are getting insanely wealthy, e.g., Al Gore.

Now, if NatGeo would only shine a spotlight on all the shoddy journals publishing bogus global warning studies.

Draculya
Male, 40-49, Asia
 12564 Posts
Friday, October 4, 2013 7:25:27 PM
Someone could make big money with this.

More Comments >
 


Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.