Tuesday, September 10, 2013 10:24:04 AM
"Proof that you've not listened to a word that`s been said"
except you missed part of my comment either deliberately or stupidly, let me reiterate, the OPPOSITE of your apparant logic would be to experiment on people locked up for non payment of fines. Now go back and read that in context where I`m argueing your trying to support your perspective by using extreme examples.
"I`ll lay odds it`s not the murder or rape we`re trying to get thru to you about"
You have no clue and dont need to know but you still failed to see the point that you dont have to be a victim to have a valid persepctive.
I wasnt a victim of the holocaust but I know and understand about it and have a valid perspective on it.
Monday, September 9, 2013 8:30:49 PM
"That's exactly what I`ve been talking about"
Well then your talking balls, using extreme examples is risible, the opposite of your apparant logic would be experiment on people locked up for non payment of fines see how stupid extremes in this situation look!?
"I`m not at all surprised how some people support a cause they know nothing about"
Maybe you missed the part where I said I and some of my family members had been victims of crime!?
Still being a victim doesnt give you an exclusive insight into the minds of criminals and the right to choose for anyone who hasnt happened to be a victim how the criminal justice system works, justice isnt predicated on revenge or victimhood.