Sunday, July 7, 2013 4:13:36 PM
Doesn't make the post any less valid or less funny, though. You`re right there. It was completely invalid and not the least bit funny before I ever commented on it. Nothing I said had any effect on that.
Sunday, July 7, 2013 3:24:53 PM
@5Cats - The list of "935 Lies" are not from "being wrong" or "bad intel." All of that was disregarded by the people who did that study. They focused on lies that were told for the run-up to the war meant to deceive the public in order to get support for the war.
There's a difference between "being wrong" and "bare faced lying" eh? Or has @WhoDat never done EITHER in his life? (and thus wouldn`t know...)
So the evil Bush got the British to lie for him too? Amazing for "a monkey" eh? And Saddam DID HAVE WMDs that were "unaccounted for"! It`s a fact! They MIGHT have been there? Or gone? Who knows because he KICKED OUT THE UN INSPECTORS! He DID have a "nuclear program", although Israel blew his reactor to smithereens... These are facts, not lies. Long and short of it: The UN had EVERY right to re-invade after years of violations of the Cease-Fire treaty. PERIOD. "Selling it" to the American public is called "propaganda", not "lies"... You`re an Army Guy, you ought to KNOW that