Monday, June 17, 2013 9:45:20 PM
whodat6484 pretty much summed it up. Banning guns is not going to prevent crazy people from committing such atrocities. There is no legal gun ownership in China yet mass killings like this happen, and it's not the first time.
Also people tend to overlook the fact that at Columbine and (I believe) Aurora, the murderers had IED`s ready but did not use them, or they failed. Had they focused on those devices instead of their guns, the death tolls arguably may have been much higher.
Monday, June 17, 2013 9:17:17 PM
@collegebound: Oh you innocent lad! #1: The Gun-Grabbers DO INDEED want to grab ALL the guns! Every last legally owned one of them! Look at Australia! What they did?
#2 Columbine: NOT "military grade" weapons. Aurora? NOT "military grade" weapons. In fact? "military grade" weapons use in murders of ANY sort are SO RARE it's unbelievable! At least in the USA. In Africa? Commonplace. But that`s a WHOLE NEW kettle of worms isn`t it?
When`s the last time any gun-using shooter(s) killed 47 people in the USA? Hummm?
Monday, June 17, 2013 8:50:07 PM
i dont keep up with the whole gun control thing but last time i checked we didn't want to ban ALL of the guns...just military grade ones from people who ARENT military...
we`re tired of columbine kids and movie shooter uppers...