I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Georgia House Bill 352 [Pic+]

Georgia state panel to determine which Federal laws to ignore.

submitted by: Gerry1of1
< Back Next >
Georgia House Bill 352 [Pic+]. Georgia state panel to determine which Federal laws to ignore.
+ Add to Favs
View/Add
Hits: 4933 | Favorites: 0 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 1.8 | Category: News & Politics | Date: 04/06/2013
 
 popular today
19 True Facts About Everyday Life [Pix] Listing some of the most hurting truths about everyday life.
Porn Star Goes On Sex Tour Of Britain [Pic] Rebecca More plans to have sex with 20 competition winners in the back of a lorry all across Britain.
Just Go Ahead And Admit It [Pic] Personally, I would do both. Don`t doubt me.
22 Terrific Trivia Tidbits [Pix] Time to get down to a group of ferrets.
Fancy Some Implantable Tech? [Pix] 8 New Technologies That Could Very Soon Be Inside You
More Comments >

WhoSaidWhat
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 198 Posts
Monday, April 8, 2013 2:49:16 AM
I don't see where a state choosing to ignore a federal law should result in a withdrawal of federal funding, except for maybe funding related directly to the law being ignored. If the fed outlaws sky-blue cars (silly, I know, its an example), and a state chooses not to arrest people for driving sky-blue cars, then, by all means, the fed can withhold funds for training law enforcement on how to tell the difference between sky-blue, cornflower blue, and baby blue. However, it would be ridiculous for the fed to withhold, say, funding for a large highway upgrade because of it. Besides, a state choosing to ignore a federal law doesn`t mean that the law doesn`t exist in that state, just that the state won`t enforce it. If a federal officer issues a citation/arrests someone for the federal law, that would be "legal", but the state won`t do it for them.

QueenZira
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
 2181 Posts
Sunday, April 7, 2013 9:50:53 AM
If Feds pass laws they shouldn't that`s up to the courts to decide, not the states. The states are subordinate to the Law of the Land as they are all part of the same damn country.

This whole Stoner`s Dilemma you`ve brought up here sets the stage for a future court challenge, and that boys and girls is how law is adjudicated here in the USA. The more you know.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14376 Posts
Saturday, April 6, 2013 9:19:33 PM
It works like this: states should obey all the federal laws that liberals agree with, and they should ignore all the federal laws that liberals disagree with. Any questions?

markust123
Male, 40-49, Western US
 3784 Posts
Saturday, April 6, 2013 5:34:54 PM
I wouldn't want to live in the idiotic district that voted this idiot in.

DuckBoy87
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 2681 Posts
Saturday, April 6, 2013 4:49:36 PM
@CaptKangaroo: then every state that has legalized weed, for any usage whatsoever, also needs to be stripped of federal funding until compliance of the Federal law.


People want things to change, but no one wants to stand up and change it. Here we have a group of people wanting to change the status quo and is receiving backlash. Can't have your cake and eat it too, eh?

More Comments >
 


Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.