I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Brian Cox Makes A Cloud Chamber... SCIENCE!

Cosmic rays--Wonders of Life, amazeballs again.

submitted by: blackcatseye
< Back Next >
Brian Cox Makes A Cloud Chamber... SCIENCE!. Cosmic rays--Wonders of Life, amazeballs again.
+ Add to Favs
Hits: 6086 | Favorites: 2 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 3.2 | Category: Science | Date: 03/06/2013
 popular today
Happy As A Clam [Pic] Is this why they`re happy?
Curves Are Sexy [Pic] Stop the double standards!
15 Famous Men Who Were Sexually Assaulted [Pix] ABUSE KNOWS NO GENDER.
A Proposition You Can`t Refuse [Pic] Imagine what the poor girl would do for a Klondike bar.
Nivea Knows... [Pic] It`s surprising how many men have dry skin.
More Comments >

Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 874 Posts
Friday, March 8, 2013 8:03:45 AM
When we see anything, the image that we see is the light that was previously created by or more usually reflected or scattered from the thing that we see. We do not see what is there now, we see the thing as it was when the light was emitted. Seeing things is a primary source of gaining knowledge, there is nothing implied or inferred or indirect about it. Light from stars is one kind of cosmic ray. When you look at a star you see it as it was when the light was emitted. You directly look back in time every time you look at anything.

There is no inference, you do not see the light as it is now, you see the star as it was then.

I hope I'm making this easy enough for you to follow so you don`t have to resort to shouting about how other people blindly refuse to accept your theories without direct evidence. Seeing a thing is about as direct as it gets.

Male, 18-29, Europe
 2850 Posts
Friday, March 8, 2013 7:42:42 AM

*pinches nose*

CrakrJak claimed that cosmic rays have been around since forever.

We have direct observable evidence that they are here, now. And they are moving in directions and speeds that indicate that they originated from distant points in the distant past.

However, our knowledge of their past comes from our observation of their present state, NOT their past state: we can't view that for obvious reasons. By this I mean that it is "indirect" evidence.

The reason I pointed all that out is because CrakrJak pooh-poohs exactly that kind of evidence when it comes to evolution, yet accepts that kind of evidence (as do the rest of us) when it comes to other things.


You clearly haven`t been in these kinds of discussions on IAB long, because if you were you`d be well aware of my stance on things.

Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 874 Posts
Friday, March 8, 2013 7:18:57 AM
Also, when I made the first comment I was going to add that physics, contrary to popular belief is not set in stone. Any physics lecturer worth his salt will readily admit that everything he is teaching you is probably wrong. Physicists are trained to look for mistakes, inconsistencies and failures in physics so that it can be improved.

Sticking dogmatically to a theory and refuting any argument with "You're a crazy" sounds more like something a church would do than science.

Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 874 Posts
Friday, March 8, 2013 7:00:36 AM
I think most people would regard looking at something as pretty direct evidence. The speed of light can be directly measured. I don't buy your "indirect" argument.

Male, 50-59, Western US
 33912 Posts
Friday, March 8, 2013 6:11:50 AM

I didn't see any damn cloud.

More Comments >

Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2015 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.