I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Thorium Reactors Explained In 5 minutes

This should be the future of energy production

submitted by: CrakrJak
< Back Next >
Thorium Reactors Explained In 5 minutes. This should be the future of energy production
+ Add to Favs
Hits: 7313 | Favorites: 2 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 3.4 | Category: Science | Date: 01/19/2013
 popular today
Fiscal Responsibility - Can I Haz It? [Pic] That vacation was great. Now I have to work two jobs to pay for it....
Meet Moldy The Clown! [Pic] He smells like Bengay and only has hard candy, but wait until you see him juggle his colostomy bag!
57 Photos From World War 2 [Pix] I haven`t seen most of these! New for me and very interesting!
How To Fix A Flat Tire Like A Man [Gif] It`s actually really easy to explain. You fill the tire with a flammable gas, then light it. Sounds legit!..
That`s A Bad Sign [Pic] If you`re too stupid to know this is bad, then maybe you need his service.
More Comments >

Male, 30-39, Europe
 12144 Posts
Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:18:47 PM
Angilion, save your breath when it comes to arguing with Crakrjak. This is the bit where he ceases to comment further, because he's already been rightfully placed into a corner as a scientifically illiterate dickhead.

Male, 40-49, Europe
 12381 Posts
Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:30:21 AM
Thallium-208 is one of the arguments in favour of using thorium for fission because it reduces the chance of nuclear terrorism. You can't do it on a small scale, as a terrorist group would have to, because it decays into such a powerful gamma emitter. Even if you have suicide workers who are willing to die from the radiation exposure in order to build a bomb, your facility will be easily detected. Moving the material would also be much harder for the same reason.

I think your thorium fission power station small enough to go on a tractor trailer is impossible as a result. I think you just couldn`t shield it well enough in that size. Gamma radiation in the MeV range takes a lot of stopping.

Male, 40-49, Europe
 12381 Posts
Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:16:17 PM
Angillion: Thallium-208 is way way down the decay scale. In fact it hit stable lead before it turns into Thalium for a couple of minutes.

You have misunderstood the thorium decay chain, and also misunderstood radioactive decay in general.

When a material reaches a stable isotope, it stops undergoing radioactive decay. That's what "stable" means in this context - an isotope that does not undergo radioactive decay.

The Thorium decay chain reaches thallium-208 *before* Lead-208. Thallium-208 is radioactive and decays into lead-208, which is a stable isotope of lead and therefore the end of the decay chain.

Male, 40-49, Midwest US
 17367 Posts
Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:15:14 AM
Angillion: Thallium-208 is way way down the decay scale. In fact it hit stable lead before it turns into Thalium for a couple of minutes. Since lead is in and of itself a radiation shielding material, I don't see a problem there.

Male, 40-49, Europe
 12381 Posts
Monday, January 21, 2013 12:05:00 PM
Oh, and about Washington state...

They're generating a smallish minority of their electricity from wind power.

It isn`t free - it`s very expensive.

It isn`t their sole means of generation, or even a large part of it.

It is never planned to be, because they employ people who understand power generation.

What I said about CSP applies to other renewables too, in different areas. CSP in hot uninhabited areas, wind in windy uninhabited areas.

CSP is appropriate in some areas, if you back it with a cutting edge HVDC grid (which is very far indeed from free) and you retain a large *controllable* generating capacity to maintain constant matching of supply to demand.

Unless someone comes up with an efficient way to store GWhs of electricity, renewables can`t be the main generating method, let alone the only one, even if we`re willing to eat the cost and environmental impact.

More Comments >

Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |