Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:02:49 AM
CrakrJak I don't pay much attention to this site, especially comments, nor did I read any replies besides like the first 3 to mine, but do I care that it was the same argument as used by the Nazis? I don`t see how just because the argument was used by them makes it invalid. Also, they didn`t make anyone "unborn", they killed and tortured them. So your point is invalid completely by there. Also, they did a lot of science experiments which helped us, but I don`t see us rejecting anything they found out. Great reason to make more lives miserable, how about we breed humans to live like them? They`re worse than humans and a way bigger problem anyway. I don`t see any animals damaging the entire planet for greed and lazines like America. And I`m a closer to republican, American meat eating guy. Its just pretty stupid to be such a dick then treat humans like gods. Too long, I get it.
And i'm glad you disagree, becuase it is a slippery slope and it needs to be watched vigantly. I don`t agree on all circumstances either. with euthanasia, a person is old enough to make his own choice, and over here we have quite a strict procedure were the person needs to make a request and two doctors have to agree that the person is suffering is without relief. Having seen my mother die of cancer, i am reliefed that the option is there for those who want it. With abortion you are making the quality of life descision for someone else and that is a dangerous situation, on the other hand there are clear cut cases where suffering would be the only outcome of birth (such as a harlequin baby) (mind you, there is one case where the kid lived up to 11) but in some cases i have the feeling that abortion is used as a birthcontrol measure, and with that i dissagree. And that is why in my opinion, you need two opossing opinions,