Tuesday, November 6, 2012 3:15:19 PM
"orly? Why exactly *should* they be? Their only obligation is to pursue profits, to be sure, but that doesn't explain why they should be." It taints the objective perspective by injecting an outside weighting of actions. Does the profits go up if they lay off unused staff? Does the public think they are moral by cutting down to half of their employees?
Tuesday, November 6, 2012 9:55:46 AM
And they should be amoral orly? Why exactly *should* they be? Their only obligation is to pursue profits, to be sure, but that doesn't explain why they should be.