Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:55:22 PM
@5cats, Pedophilia is not a sexual orientation. Hi @Keegan31! Thanks for your thoughtful and POLITE reply! I seriously appreciate that. However, you are seriously wrong. #1 Pedophilia is indeed a sexual orientation. Sad but true. [quote]A homosexual man is only attracted to other men. He has no sexual attraction to women whatsoever.[/quote] FINALLY! Someone who understands and agrees with me! idk if you've follower the "gay debate" at IAB but there`s lots of folks who think that "gay" men can also have sex with women and... still be gay! NONSENSE! That makes them bi-sexual! DUH! So thanks for agreeing with me. [quote]They are still attracted to adults, they just also have a kink for children.[/quote] Um, no. Not at all. A "pedophile" by definition is ONLY sexually attracted to pre-puberty people. Period. Not adults at all. I have more, but the character counter says STOP!
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:13:53 PM
@5cats, Pedophilia is not a sexual orientation. You cannot compare a sexual orientation like homosexuality to a psychosis like pedophilia.
A homosexual man is only attracted to other men. He has no sexual attraction to women whatsoever.
A pedophile is someone who has a kink for children. They are still attracted to adults, they just also have a kink for children.
A pedophile can be either heterosexual or homosexual. Their sexual orientation does not effect their kink. (i.e. a heterosexual man may have a pedophilic kink that focuses on boys. This does not make him a homosexual.)
I person with a foot fetish, is not sexually oriented to feet. I person with an incest fetish is not exclusively attracted to members of their own family.
Homosexuality is not a fetish, pedophilia is. You are born homosexual, you are not born a pedophile.
Stop arguing points you are not qualified to argue, this spread of misinformation is hurtful to all.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:00:51 AM
@davymid: I'm objecting to his blanket use of "sexual orientation" to somehow "justify" same-sex marriage. Using such a broad term allows other, UN-desireable groups "equal rights" too. One does NOT need to justify it at all! If enough folks agree, pass a law, society accepts? Then presto! It`s open and legal! Just like it is in Canada, ok? Making up bull-poop arguements does not help one`s cause, IMHO.
"Two mutually consenting adults..." becomes "Two mutually consenting PERSONS..." with the stroke of a pen! Just like ancient Rome, ancient Greece, and many not-so ancient cultures, correct?
@Kegomatix: People are not "born gay" that is what I argue against, ok? Gays can have lots of rights, in fact they DO! I have no problem with that. Heteros are not "born that way" either, just fyi...
Don't even bother with 5Cats, he uses the same argument (albeit completely asinine) for every gay marriage discussion. There is no reasoning with idiots like him who think they`re right about everything and that people who do not live exactly as he does are wrong.