Tuesday, October 16, 2012 6:42:12 PM
Actually CrakrJak, social Darwinism was heavily favoured in America, from slavery, to the actions of Industrialists. Any system can implement it.
'The way I see it, it`s a spontaneous process in which society selects and preserves the traditions and norms that ultimately enhance human well being. Not an artificial construct humans can use to identify "deficients" in society.`
That`s another problem with the concept, it`s vague, and can actually mean conflicting things.
Monday, October 15, 2012 5:36:32 PM
Now that I think about it, a more appropriate term is "social evolution". Hitler et al engaged in what I'd call "collectivist Darwinism" a total perversion of Darwin`s ideas.
Monday, October 15, 2012 4:59:31 PM
That's because social darwinism is not capitalist in nature. It`s socialist in nature and the countries in which it has been applied have been communist, socialist and fascist. Those 3 systems of government are about government control and manipulation of production.
This is an inherently contradictory statement. Darwinism is all about competition, which statists simply don`t understand.
[quote]Laissez-faire capitalism[/quote]
Laissez-faire does not mean totally unbound by regulation. Simply enough regulation to protect property rights against theft and aggression.
Monday, October 15, 2012 4:43:11 PM
Cajun: That's because social darwinism is not capitalist in nature. It`s socialist in nature and the countries in which it has been applied have been communist, socialist and fascist. Those 3 systems of government are about government control and manipulation of production.
Laissez-faire capitalism, with no regulation, leads to monopolies and oligarchies, that is totally the opposite of `evolution` as a concept.
Regulated capitalism and fair trade lead to better competition and more consumer choice.