"That means Reagan had 70 months of unemployment over 10% in REAL unemployment numbers. So CLEARLY Obama didn't have more unemployment above 8% than all other presidents combined right? I`m just trying to follow. Well looky there a comparison, a comparison adding 3% to Reagan and nothing to Obama."
I feel like I`m going insane. I didn`t say what Obama`s number`s were in that quote. All I did was turn Reagan`s numbers into your "real" numbers thereby giving him 70 months of unemployment above 8%. Which is more months than Obama would have over 8%. I never said what Obama`s "real" numbers would be. However, IT DOESN`T MATTER. Even if Obama`s "real" number is 90% unemployment he STILL wouldn`t have "more months above 8%" than Reagan because he hasn`t been in office 70 months.
"Oh but YES YES You did, then compared that with the 10% unemployment I said Reagan inherited and then said Obama was better."
Ughhhh. No I didn't. You can say it all you want. It doesn`t make it true. If you are so sure I said it quote me. Go ahead. I don`t delete my posts.
Arguing with you is like arguing with a child. I don`t agree with AJ, but we were able to have a back and forth debate based on facts. For whatever reason that is impossible with you. I have to spend my time repeating myself and defending myself against accusations you make that simply aren`t true.
This is a fact, although I`m sure you will find SOME way to spin it:
Unemployment today is lower than when Obama took office. At this point in Reagan`s first term unemployment was the same as when he took office.