I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Savannah Dietrich Doesn`t Face Contempt Charges

Click Here to Launch:



Savannah Dietrich Doesn`t Face Contempt Charges
(Will open in new window or tab)
submitted by: JUGGALETTEx0
< Back Next >
The Kentucky 17-year-old victim tweeted the names of the guys that raped her. She was close to jail time for that...
+ Add to Favs
View/Add
Hits: 7977 | Favorites: 0 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 3.1 | Category: News & Politics | Date: 07/24/2012
 
 popular today
Personal Ad Definitions [Pic] This is so biased it`s true.
God`s Plan [Pic] Infinite wisdom at work.
Time For Some Target Practice [Pic] Another bullseye!
Doctor Forced Coworkers To Motorboat Her [Pic] She also wrote some bad prescriptions and a few other unsavory things Doctors aren`t supposed to do.
26 Manly Tips For The Manly Man [Pix] I`m sure you manly men already know most of these, but does it hurt to brush up on your manly ways?
More Comments >

Tacos4Brkfst
Male, 18-29, Western US
 603 Posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:46:16 AM
The little girl should learn some self control. Both in the drinking and the tweeting department.

In other news: Its not news.

robosnitz
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 2752 Posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:53:15 AM
Good for her.

drawman61
Male, 50-59, Europe
 5355 Posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 4:23:06 AM
It's way past time when the authorities should be protecting the victims not the perps. If you step outside the law you should not expect any help from that law.

blastaof
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 21 Posts
Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:05:02 PM
OldOllie: You don't have to agree to a Court order ... that`s why it is an order.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 13352 Posts
Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:32:44 PM
she was clearly in violation of a court order not to speak publicly about the case.

She was never party to the agreement, and I don't think the judge had the legal authority to strip her of her 1st Amendment right to free speech. I think he knew he was in the wrong, and when she called his bluff, he backed off.

More Comments >
 


Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.