I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Savannah Dietrich Doesn`t Face Contempt Charges

Click Here to Launch:



Savannah Dietrich Doesn`t Face Contempt Charges
(Will open in new window or tab)
submitted by: JUGGALETTEx0
< Back Next >
The Kentucky 17-year-old victim tweeted the names of the guys that raped her. She was close to jail time for that...
+ Add to Favs
View/Add
Hits: 7981 | Favorites: 0 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 3.1 | Category: News & Politics | Date: 07/24/2012
 
 popular today
Showing The Court Proper Respect [Pic] Ass you can see your honor....
15 Regrettable Penis Tattoos [Pix] If you get it somewhere that is easily seen, understand that you will have to explain yourself more than once. NSFW
Sexy Young Asian Rips Her Top Off [Gif] Now I feel ripped off.
I Want To Hang Out With This Guy [Pic] Seems like a great fellow. Needs to work on his spelling.
Ronald McThor [Pic] This is only missing a Burger King Loki.
More Comments >

Tacos4Brkfst
Male, 18-29, Western US
 605 Posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:46:16 AM
The little girl should learn some self control. Both in the drinking and the tweeting department.

In other news: Its not news.

robosnitz
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 2752 Posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:53:15 AM
Good for her.

drawman61
Male, 50-59, Europe
 6049 Posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 4:23:06 AM
It's way past time when the authorities should be protecting the victims not the perps. If you step outside the law you should not expect any help from that law.

blastaof
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 21 Posts
Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:05:02 PM
OldOllie: You don't have to agree to a Court order ... that`s why it is an order.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14422 Posts
Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:32:44 PM
she was clearly in violation of a court order not to speak publicly about the case.

She was never party to the agreement, and I don't think the judge had the legal authority to strip her of her 1st Amendment right to free speech. I think he knew he was in the wrong, and when she called his bluff, he backed off.

More Comments >
 


Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.