I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Savannah Dietrich Doesn`t Face Contempt Charges

Click Here to Launch:



Savannah Dietrich Doesn`t Face Contempt Charges
(Will open in new window or tab)
submitted by: JUGGALETTEx0
< Back Next >
The Kentucky 17-year-old victim tweeted the names of the guys that raped her. She was close to jail time for that...
+ Add to Favs
View/Add
Hits: 7977 | Favorites: 0 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 3.1 | Category: News & Politics | Date: 07/24/2012
 
 popular today
That`s A Bad Sign [Pic] If you`re too stupid to know this is bad, then maybe you need his service.
Dear Landlord [Pic] Passive aggressive tenants when their lease expires....
Mother Of The Year - Painted Up Hussy Edition[Pic] Bad parenting or is nudity no big deal?
What A D*ck [Pic] Some people will do anything to ride in the carpool lane...
Unbelievable Old School Sexiest Advertising [Pix] Extremely sexist ads from 50`s, 60`s, 70`s including the Lysol douche--- yes, I said Lysol douche!
More Comments >

Tacos4Brkfst
Male, 18-29, Western US
 603 Posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:46:16 AM
The little girl should learn some self control. Both in the drinking and the tweeting department.

In other news: Its not news.

robosnitz
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 2752 Posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:53:15 AM
Good for her.

drawman61
Male, 50-59, Europe
 5491 Posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 4:23:06 AM
It's way past time when the authorities should be protecting the victims not the perps. If you step outside the law you should not expect any help from that law.

blastaof
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 21 Posts
Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:05:02 PM
OldOllie: You don't have to agree to a Court order ... that`s why it is an order.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 13574 Posts
Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:32:44 PM
she was clearly in violation of a court order not to speak publicly about the case.

She was never party to the agreement, and I don't think the judge had the legal authority to strip her of her 1st Amendment right to free speech. I think he knew he was in the wrong, and when she called his bluff, he backed off.

More Comments >
 


Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.