Sunday, July 15, 2012 9:16:40 PM
mesovortex, you're as full of $#!+ as constipated elephant. You don`t have to research the positions of the global warming hucksters. It`s being shoved down our throats every day through every possible media source you can imagine. You couldn`t avoid it if you tried.
If, however, you seriously wanted to understand the skeptics` position, you actually have to make an effort to hear their point of view in their own words. (Listening to what the liberal media, liberal politicians, and corrupt liberal "scientists" TELL you about the skeptics` positions doesn`t count, because they all lie.)
You`re the one with his head up his ass, and you seem quite content to keep it there. Well, that`s just fine. YOU save the planet by driving around in a f***ing little tinfoil deathtrap. That leaves more gas for me, and if we ever meet at 50 mph, its all the less damage to my V8 SUV.
And "hide the decline" still equals "falsify the data."
Sunday, July 15, 2012 11:20:26 AM
The ClimateGate crew knew that without some TRD included, they'd be laughed at! So they "fixed it" using as severely UN-scientific "trick" (as they called it). "
That`s what I said, specifically mentioning that they themselves refered to "hiding the decline" as a "TRICK". Your reply:
[quote]You didn`t research this. It`s actually scientific to do this because that data after a certain point wasn`t reliable and was divergent.[/quote]
Not olny can you read my mind, KNOWING 100% that I`ve NEVER researched this, nor read papers written by those who have extensively sdone so: you KNOW I have not! BUT you then say: "it`s actually scientific to do this" meaning... THEY DID IT! I don`t CARE if you think it`s "justified" or valid, THEY DID IT! THAT is all I said, and YOU proved me right.
Sunday, July 15, 2012 3:46:27 AM
5cats: "Of course it makes absolutely ZERO sense. I suppose I'm just not as smart as @randomvortex is..."
I never said I was smarter than you overall. However, I`ve definitely researched this topic more than you have and this is quite apparent since I`m able to correct you on many things that you`ve said and based on the fact that you are incorrect about many things you have said and that you have a terrible understanding of climate science and the current consensus right now, as well as the consensus in the past.
I`d say that`s a pretty strong case that you are not very well informed in this subject.
By the way, how hard is it to just copy and paste someone`s name? Is it really necessary to mock their names like that and scream at the keyboard? How hard is it to just stick to the facts?