Monday, June 4, 2012 12:26:47 PM
@jtrebowski Because he wasn't at the time? I don`t understand why I have to keep repeating myself: If all Zimmerman did was follow him (without issuing serious vocal threats), then he IS NOT THE AGGRESSOR.
Monday, June 4, 2012 8:50:59 AM
Crakrjak: And that's all it is...circumstantial, based on accounts...some of which have changed over the course of time. Besides, once you`ve been told the police are on their way, why would anyone get out of their car if someone was acting "beserk"?
Monday, June 4, 2012 3:28:49 AM
You weren't there CJ, There`s plenty of evidence against Zimmerman. Primarily that he didn`t "stand his ground" he stalked and confronted. Let the trial happen and put a sock in your pronouncements of innocence. You`re starting to sound like a lunatic Canadian cat lover. A trial affords justice. It`s what you`d expect for your child had he been murdered by a racist, wanna-be cop.
Monday, June 4, 2012 2:44:09 AM
jtrebowski: Martin was the aggressor and all the physical evidence, eyewitness accounts and circumstantial evidence points to a troubled teen with a drug problem acting paranoid and going berserk.