Saturday, May 26, 2012 9:16:17 PM
Thank god someone explained this to me, because I saw it on another site two and still had no idea what I was supposed to be seeing. It drove me a little insane. I mean, I kind of saw it when I first looked, but I didn't understand that that was the point.
Of course they do say that males get dumber when exposed to attractive women, so ya know, maybe I can blame it on my dong...I find myself doing that a lot now that I think about it...
Saturday, May 26, 2012 9:02:20 AM
No, see the joke here is that it APPEARS that the woman is spreading her legs wide, which would be an oddly erotic position to take, given the overall platonic tone of the subjects' expressions. But instead, it turns out that no person`s legs are spread at all! In fact, the legs in question belong to two entirely separate and distinct persons of female gender. I hope I`ve cleared up all the confusion. (I would like to point out, however, that you can totally see a little bit of the blonde-in-the-middle`s snizzmeats. )
Saturday, May 26, 2012 7:41:43 AM
I know this is suppose to be about the girl who blinked and ruined the photo... but did you guys see that what looks like a girl with her legs spread is really just 2 different people's legs?