Sunday, April 1, 2012 2:14:24 PM
Um, she proved that 1=1 and that .999repeating is .999repeating... She would sneak in a -.999repeating to a subtraction rather than a -1...
1/3 is as close as we can get to 33.333333333_%, but it's not dead on.
I don`t like her explanation, her mathematics only work in her weird way here, not in my mind. If you have .9999repeating, you are lacking one itty-bitty fraction missing to complete the 1, even if it is intifitismally lesser