We didn't have a debate. All I did was respond to some grumpy 50-something who apparantly decided to act like his shoe size by painting everyone else as liars, idiots, and terrorist sympathizers. If that`s the way you prefer to debate then I have some advice for you, courtesy of Jon Stewart.
Saturday, December 17, 2011 1:48:45 AM
davymid: Glad to know that you supported Saddam Hussein's brutal dictatorship rather than freedom and democracy. Bullwank and f*ck you. Not what I said. When the US invades every place that has a brutal dictatorship, I`ll concede. But you won`t support the invasion of Zimbabwe, or North Korea, or China, or numerous other states, becuase you`re afraid of the consequences. Iraq was an easy target. Easily bullied.
Still, I await the discovery of those WMDs in Iraq, which most of will not forget was the justification for the war in first place. After what they did to us in 9-11, those Iraqi terrorist Al-Quaeda supporting bastards.
Friday, December 16, 2011 8:20:01 PM
I also see no merit in answering your loaded questions. What I see is someone who just lost the argument but doesn't have the intellectual honesty to admit it.
Friday, December 16, 2011 5:21:04 PM
"You seem to think that we should wait until AFTER a terrorist attack before we defend ourselves."
I know, I know, it seems like lately I only pop up uninvited to pick on Oldie, but you have to admit that he asks for it sometimes... I see no reason why that sentence couldn't be aplied to "them". "They" shouldn`t have to wait for an attack either. Congratulations, you`ve justified 9/11, amongst other things. Neat.