Tuesday, November 22, 2011 9:05:58 PM
We must acknowledge that teens are sexual animals that phuck. They'll make it up as they go along anyway.. unless of course they`re scared to death because "YOU" don`t educate them properly. As parents there is very little "you` have to teach children, but i guarantee you most of them will be phucking behind your back because you are all giant pussies afraid of crotchless underwear.
Tuesday, November 22, 2011 9:04:12 PM
People are still infantile and stupid.... way to go ozmose. Someone has to hail the glory of teens sexing up teens. It is underwear. There is no pedo sign on them that says "these are for use by underage girls to phuck adults," But by the way everyone is acting that is exactly what was done. Sorry if you didn't get laid as a teen (like i did many times) but i think that underwear without a crotch isn`t going to change the world. We were phucking without them in stores marketed for us. But if a parent is going to have a healthier role as a sexual "rolemodel" (someone who`s phucked a lot and lived to tell of it with wisdom) i think perhaps the purchase of such things as toys and sexual apparel along with wise advice as to what it is to be a healthy "sexual animal" is less dangerous than what people here are doing.
Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:06:58 AM
First of all I doubt they were sized to fit a little girl, just not this lady's huge ass. Second, when I was 16 my 15 year old girlfriend had crotchless panties, and it was awesome.