Monday, October 3, 2011 6:17:10 AM
@Angilion - ... and now you are arguing semantics, yet another poor debate tactic.
Whatever term you want to use - class... warfare, conflict, struggle - everyone whose head isn't up their ass knows what it means. Maybe it`s different where you live.
Like many people who operate in theory rather than reality, you have a great ability to say a lot yet say nothing.
If you are living in the 21st century, you obviously skipped over the 20th, which is the only one relevant to this post.
Monday, October 3, 2011 12:28:29 AM
@Angilion - My silly fantasies? Class conflict is a fantasy? What century are you living in?
21st.
You, however, are in the 18th. You just fail to realise it because you have no idea what "socialist class warfare" is. You're now talking about class conflict, which is something completely different. I`m not sure you even know enough to know that, since you refer to them as the same thing.
[quote]ongratulations on the medieval reference that was totally irrelevant to the conversation.[/quote]
It`s relevant and I explained why. Your ideological faith prevents you understanding the relevance, but that`s not my problem.
[quote]AND you`re not actually debating anything I said[/quote]
You might think so, but since you`ve proven yourself unable to understand even when examples are provided, it`s not surprising that you`re wrong about that too.
Sunday, October 2, 2011 10:29:23 AM
@jtrebowski - I wasn't "blaming" anyone for class warfare. I said it`s a flawed premise that all people who have money earned it in an unethical way. That happens to be a leftist premise... I blame both parties for the fiscal stupidity and otherwise crony behavior of our federal gov`t. Overall, we probably agree more than we disagree.
Sunday, October 2, 2011 10:19:59 AM
@Angilion - My silly fantasies? Class conflict is a fantasy? What century are you living in?... Congratulations on the medieval reference that was totally irrelevant to the conversation. And the "funny" references. Both poor debate tactics. AND you're not actually debating anything I said, which is a another poor debate tactic. Come on man!
Sunday, October 2, 2011 8:41:56 AM
@5cats: no worries. It's all in good fun. Btw, just so you know, I would`ve considered voting for McCain......until he picked that goofball as his running mate :)