Bachmann Spars With Stephanopoulos. GOP Rep. Bachmann & Stephanopoulos discuss her history of `false statements` on U.S. history. Is her version correct?
Monday, July 4, 2011 4:05:21 AM
Hell I'm republican and I wouldn`t vote for her stupid, dumb, uneducated ass. Read a 4th grade "History of America" book one time bitch!
Monday, July 4, 2011 2:29:06 AM
Umm.. Ben Franklin was an abolitionist, and a Founding Father. I don't know how tirelessly he worked toward it, but certainly his writings speak to this sentiment. How hard would it have been for her to conjure this position on his part?
Sunday, July 3, 2011 11:06:07 PM
the Bible passages condemning homosexuality will be ignored by mainstream Christians in much the same way those condoning slavery are ignored today.
It isn't even necessary to go that far. If you look at the original languages, all of those passages can be interpreted to have other meanings. Some of them definitely do have other meanings and have been very obviously misinterpreted.
Sunday, July 3, 2011 11:04:12 PM
If using his own tactics against him is wrong, then isn't the whole tactic, no matter who uses it, is wrong to begin with ?
It would be, but (as has already been pointed out) that`s not what you`re doing.
Madest is not making false accusations of randomly chosen bad things, which is what you`re doing to him.
I`m still interested in why you reject the OT approval of slavery and embrace the OT condemnation of homosexual sex. It`s a blatantly inconsistent position - how do you justify it?