I Am Bored
Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Senator Ruben Diaz: Votes Against Gay NY Marriage

The only Democrat holdout: Senator Ruben Diaz. Here he is telling us why gay marriage in New York IS WRONG!

submitted by: fancylad
< Back Next >
Senator Ruben Diaz: Votes Against Gay NY Marriage. The only Democrat holdout: Senator Ruben Diaz. Here he is telling us why gay marriage in New York IS WRONG!
+ Add to Favs
View/Add
Hits: 11912 | Favorites: 0 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 2.0 | Category: News & Politics | Date: 06/27/2011
 
 popular today
What`s For Lunch? [Pic] Oh lawdy! YES!
New Superman Movie Is the Story Of Christ [Pic+] ...and being marketed as such by the studio! Complete with sermon talking points for pastors!
Ready, Set, FAIL [Pic] She totally meant to do that. On the upside I hear her grilled snapper is to die for.
Mental Health Hotline Instructions [Pic] Sounds crazy, but they work.
27 Unfortunate Layouts & Headlines [Pic+] Sometimes the editors don`t see everything.
More Comments >
Cajun247
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 9511 Posts 		Thursday, June 30, 2011 6:46:44 AM
@Oldfrt

For once I agree with you. It's always been part of my ultimatum:

Recognize all relationships or don`t
Musuko42
Male, 18-29, Europe
 2109 Posts 		Wednesday, June 29, 2011 5:46:28 AM
@Oldfrt

"So why not argue that government should not require marriage licenses at all?"

That would be an acceptable outcome: either everyone has government recognition of their relationships, or nobody does.

The complaint comes out of the disparity: some are given recognition, whilst others aren't.

"Let everyone have civil unions (for the legal stuff) and just make it nothing but private contracts?"

That is an outcome I would be happy to see.
chickiesue86
Male, 70 & Over, Canada
 273 Posts 		Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:26:46 PM
sterile man and or sterile woman...no baby. so according to jravity911 any heterosexual couples should first be tested for fertility before being granted the human right of marriage. after all, marriage is only for making babies.
jravity911
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 23 Posts 		Tuesday, June 28, 2011 12:56:08 PM
look i am not against a marriage of any two people...but it is defined as being between a man and a woman to make a family... man and man..no baby...woman and woman no baby...for a gay couple to have a child someone else has to come into play..thats why straight people dont get it. Marriage = family... people have closed eyes and will not open them for anyone.
Oldfrt
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
 611 Posts 		Tuesday, June 28, 2011 10:45:10 AM
@Gerry1of1: How does any relationship I have, no matter what it's called, affect you? How does my filing a joint tax return shake your beliefs to the core?


So why not argue that government should not require marriage licenses at all? If the purpose of marriage is to let two people in love live together, why is the government involved at all? Let everyone have civil unions (for the legal stuff) and just make it nothing but private contracts?
More Comments >
 

Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2013 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.