Louis CK On Gay Marriage [Pic]

More Comments >

PopCap Male, 30-39, Eastern US 229 Posts	Sunday, May 15, 2011 12:05:20 AM Who uses fing as an identity, anyway? Morons.*

RETARDEDBEAR Male, 18-29, Eastern US 440 Posts	Saturday, May 14, 2011 8:30:57 PM "There's a hell of a difference between a large group of people with a wide variety of views on a subject and a small group of people with very specific views on it, not all of whom are in the first group." I simplified "homosexual group advocates" to "gays." Anyone with half a brain realizes that I am not saying "all gays," but rather "people who are gay." Get a grip. "Say, for example, someone referred to "fire and brimstone" style preachers in the USA, including those visiting from other countries. Is that the same as referring to all citizens of the USA?" That is not an accurate comparison. It would be like saying "Muslims destroyed the twin towers on 9/11." Obviously I would not be inferring that ALL Muslims destroyed the twin towers, just that those that did were Muslim.

unbwogable Male, 18-29, Western US 554 Posts	Saturday, May 14, 2011 7:17:14 PM I may be slightly biased, but damn, if we wanna be miserable in marriage, let us!! lol

blounsb999 Male, 40-49, Eastern US 183 Posts	Saturday, May 14, 2011 6:04:25 AM Angilion, It may not be 'manly` to practice homosexuality but it is priestly as demonstrated time and time again. As for the difference between marriage and civil unions - we are going through that legal battle over here in the states. As a straight male I say: fine give them ALL the same legal rights and privileges through civil union. AND since the far Right is making such an issue out of it, and we do have implied separation of church and state, make EVERY couple have to go to the town hall for the same civil union. They can get married if they want to, but the legal part has to be done as the civil union. isn`t that how you do it over there?

Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe 9677 Posts	Saturday, May 14, 2011 2:57:44 AM Where is the extreme difference, if you please? I'm not sure if you`re serious, but I`m assuming you are because you quoted the relevant pieces of text rather than trying to obscure them. I`m not not sure how to go about the answer, because you`ve just quoted two pieces of text with radically different meanings and asked, apparently seriously, what the difference is. That`s weird. There`s a hell of a difference between a large group of people with a wide variety of views on a subject and a small group of people with very specific views on it, not all of whom are in the first group. Say, for example, someone referred to "fire and brimstone" style preachers in the USA, including those visiting from other countries. Is that the same as referring to all citizens of the USA?

More Comments >