9 Deadly Words Used By Women [Pic]
#10. Do these pants make my butt look big? Except that`s technically a sentence and not a word, but you get my drift.
Obama At Prom [Pic]
Thanks for pointing that out for me TIME. I would have never figured it out on my own.
Amanda Bynes Arrested Last Night [Pic]
Remember the `Drug Den` Post From Yesterday? Well she was arrested after throwing a bong out her window-Clicky for story
Sunday, February 20, 2011 7:26:02 AM
Hi everybody! My name's Crackr. Have you all heard of this totally legitimate article about global warming that`s on Prison Planet this month? No? Then you know nothing about global warming! I`m so much smarter than you all! God I love Prison Planet! LMFAO.
Saturday, February 19, 2011 8:40:23 AM
I'm saying they ensured their high percentage by choosing whom they wanted to poll.
Except you can`t prove that and that`s why I accuse you of moving the goalpost. As for NotTHATBored she did NOT bring up Michael Mann, you did. She wasn`t relying on his data to back up her argument, you on the other hand were. Ergo straw man.
Saturday, February 19, 2011 7:30:00 AM
@Crackr I just have to ask you, are you trying to say that "PrisonPlanet.com" is a legitimate source? It is not. Try again.
On the contrary I provided numerous legitimate sources in the past such as the EPA or the United States Energy Information Administration.
You provided "PrisonPlanet.com".
(I win, you lose)
Micheal Mann has nothing to do with whether or not global warming is real.
I UNLIKE YOU DO NOT RELY ON FALSE INFORMATION SO IT IS NOT SURPRISING THAT I DO NOT KNOW ABOUT HIS FAKE CHART.
See if I were you I would know about it so that I could try and pass it off as real, until someone called me on it, then I would pretend that I had never cited it!
P.S. I am very capable of using google, but I'm not going to even both looking up this off topic crap you are trying to divert me too.
I`ll bother when you learn what a legitimate source is and what is not.
Saturday, February 19, 2011 3:24:41 AM
Cajun: You also misunderstood me when I rebutted NottaSpy's link. I`m not demanding they show 100%, I`m saying they ensured their high percentage by choosing whom they wanted to poll.
It`s akin to doing a poll on Obama`s job performance and the pollsters ensured that 98% of those polled were democrats. It would not be a fair or legitimate poll, now would it ?