Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:36:20 PM
On 9/26/2004 4:36:20 PM gizmo331 wrote: also i was using the same pattern of just ones and twos and building a number consisting of ones and twos whose sum and length is exponentially larger than the previous line. which is where i think someone?'s solution doesn`t make sense to me. 1) Your answer didn`t work because it didn`t account for the number and placement of 1s and 2s. 2) The Fibonacci sequence is not exponential. Neither was the sequence of line lengths in this problem.