Friday, November 19, 2010 8:48:16 PM
"Oh, please. They are NOT sexually assaulting children."
No? If a screener on her day off did this to a little three-year-old girl from her neighborhood, they'd put her UNDER the jail. And if she EVER got out, she would have to register as a sex offender for the rest of her life.
But somehow, the exact same act that would land her in prison somehow magically stops being a sexual assault if she does it when she`s on duty at the airport.
Friday, November 19, 2010 9:03:01 AM
Oh, please. They are NOT sexually assaulting children. Be absolutely honest with yourself. If you can genuinely say that you believe they are MOLESTING CHILDREN, please re-evaluate the situation.
They're patting you down. They`re not groping your tits. They`re not sharing naked pictures of your children. Jesus Christ.
Thursday, November 18, 2010 11:32:50 PM
And to think so many people thought nothing of the so called "patriot" act. As I recall, liberals were $#!++ing bricks over the Patriot act, but I haven't heard many complaints from them over this.
What`s more intrusive, someone showing probable cause to a judge and getting a warrant to find out if a terror suspect checked out books on bomb making, or some dude feeling up your junk without any reason to suspect you`ve done anything wrong?
Or, which is worse, the FBI intercepting an email between a Taliban commander in Afghanistan and an al Qaeda leader in Yemen which happens to pass through a US server, or sexually assaulting a screaming, crying child?
Or what`s worse, the FBI and CIA sharing information on foreign and domestic terror investigations, or the TSA guys sharing a nude picture of your daughter?