Wednesday, November 10, 2010 4:21:52 AM
I think a person's position on the issue of what age is proper for phucking is largely influenced by how old they were when they got their first great phucking. If a person`s first sexual experience was non-consensual, (and they are less than society`s model for beauty) then they are likely to be against anybody enjoying phucking, especially if they are young and hot. On the other hand, if the first phucking was consensual and great, well that person would sing a different tune. My first phucking was younger than what many people find to be appropriate. They can go to hell. I thought it was great... Of course, you should abide by laws, or you will go to jail for a long time, but that doesn`t necessarily mean the laws properly reflect the issues.
Saturday, October 30, 2010 10:35:37 PM
Er this "child" was 17? Um yeah...he's probably just playing the victim card because he parents intercepted the messages.
Friday, October 29, 2010 3:58:44 PM
The whole point is that a child of 14 is not mature enough to make decisions like that, just like they're not mature enough to drive, or drink, or vote. Therefore their consent or lack of it is not the main issue.
Scenario 1: 14 year old consents to sex with someone.
Scenario 2: 14 year old is knocked out, tied up and raped.
Not the main issue..so the difference between those two scenarios is at best secondary? Really?