Tuesday, October 26, 2010 11:42:19 AM
How many of these "civilian" casualties were caused by these ragheaded scumbags hiding behind women and children and hiding inside hospitals and mosques and being protected by these so called innocents? It's a war people, don`t start none won`t be none. The problem started with the politicians trying to spin it as the US trying to liberate all those poor opressed Iraqi`s so that all you liberal european pansies would stop whining about "blood for oil". We are fighting an enemy that doesnt wear a uniform or fight under a flag. There is no way to seperate combatants from civilians when everybody from old women to children are walking around carrying Kalishnikovs. You are the same morons that think the police overreacted because they shot somebody wielding a chainsaw and didn`t stop to talk about their feelings first. You haven`t been there and it`s easy to be an armchair/monday morning quarterback. STFU!
Monday, October 25, 2010 1:03:53 AM
@almightybob: if you click on the dots, it essentially shows what it was. I saw a bunch of IED deaths, and a lot that were labeled "murders" with one civilian dead. I'm assuming the military just found the body and reported it. Ah yeah. It took me quite a few clicks to find a Coalition death, loads of civilian casualties though. I suppose it must just be every dead body they encountered, so probably not all of them were related to the war. Still sad though.
Monday, October 25, 2010 12:25:01 AM
When it says "Type: Friendly Action...Attack On: FRIEND" and shows 3 Enemy killed, what the heck does that mean? Does it mean the enemy killed themselves in a training excercise?