Monday, October 4, 2010 7:16:27 PM
come on guys, chances are if we have accounts on this site we're really not smart enough to have sensible political debates.
Monday, October 4, 2010 6:59:51 PM
Also, You could make the same 'Hitler` comparison to the popularity Obama once had. It`s a misused and overused comparison, Because neither of them are similar to Schicklgruber. Can you not see how you just proved my point?
Numbers mean NOTHING, because large gatherings of stupid people still only have enough brain cells to make a couple moves in chess.
The number of followers NEVER means someone is right. It means they`re charismatic, loud, obnoxious, and are able to convince people that "I`m on your side!"
[quote]Then again, It`s likely your belief that `smart` people are a minority and `dumb` people are the majority, Which would be really condescending.[/quote] And you`re going to tell me I`m wrong? Studies (and common sense, and just overall general observation) show that, in general, stupid people breed more. Also, in general, stupid parents don`t exactly raise geniuses.
Monday, October 4, 2010 5:15:05 PM
Altaru: I believe your analysis is lacking because every liberal that's had a similar TV or radio show has had low ratings.
Then again, It`s likely your belief that `smart` people are a minority and `dumb` people are the majority, Which would be really condescending.
Also, You could make the same `Hitler` comparison to the popularity Obama once had. It`s a misused and overused comparison, Because neither of them are similar to Schicklgruber.