Wednesday, June 9, 2010 3:08:13 PM
I don't know what a child or adult is, but you see no difference between a 30 year old and a 13 year old who are both "past puberty"? This is the RIDICULOUS (arousing or deserving ricicule, I looked it up in the Dictionary :P) sort of arguement you`re throwing at me.
You said there wasn`t a difference between 5 and 15.
I didn`t say there wasn`t a difference between 13 and 30.
So no, it isn`t the same.
Anyway, this thread is now old enough for the transient nature of IAB to have ensured that no-one else is reading it. I no longer need to defend myself in public, so the only reason to continue would be if I cared what you think.
Tuesday, June 8, 2010 6:25:37 PM
As for borders: Consider polyamory. If a man (or woman for that matter) has 3 spouses, in say Iran where it's perfectly legal, are they perverts? In OUR society yes, but NOT theirs. Are they immoral? Illegal? Same applies. By THEIR measure it`s OK.
Now for the more important question of child sex. In a place where 12 is the age of concent (like Canada almost had) then is a 30 yo having sex with a 13 yo illegal? Immoral? A perversion? I PERSONALLY WOULD SAY: YES YES YES However the sad reality would be different, obviously it wouldn`t be illegal in that place. But I remind you that Canada has a law that says if one goes to another country and commit pedophilia, a Canadian faces arrest IN CANDADA which is something I wholey approve of!
So I hope this sorts a few things out, it is not my intention to flame, troll or otherwise p*ss you off, eh?
Tuesday, June 8, 2010 6:14:50 PM
*sigh* I don't know what a child or adult is, but you see no difference between a 30 year old and a 13 year old who are both "past puberty"? This is the RIDICULOUS (arousing or deserving ricicule, I looked it up in the Dictionary :P) sort of arguement you`re throwing at me.
I`ve already said that sex with a child should carry the death penalty (I believe I said 6-yo but I`m not about to look it up) what more do you want? Yet you repeat your nonsense, almost like you never even read it...
I understand that your opinions are not mine, and I thank God for THAT!
it means asking your girlfriend for ID! Okie, I DO see the problem here, and I do apologise. I did NOT mean YOU (Angilion) I meant `you` as in everyone. So yup, I can see how you`d read that badly (my bad!) and yup I am sorry I wasn`t more clear. I certianly never intended that to be a personal attack, and understand your being upset by it. I know I`d be!
Tuesday, June 8, 2010 5:11:16 PM
Do you think that someone swaps between being a paedophile and not being a paedophile simply by crossing a border?
Sadly this is the case, I don't AGREE with it but you simply don`t understand it.
It isn`t the case and the lack of understanding is yours.
You don`t understand what a paedophile is and therefore you don`t understand why a paedophile is always a paedophile regardless of where they are.
You don`t understand what a child is.
You don`t understand what an adult is.
You don`t understand that adolescence exists.
You don`t understand what the law is, specifically that you don`t understand what an age of majority is or that there are various legal distinctions between a minor and a person who has reached the age of majority.
You don`t understand that a statement is not a question.
You don`t understand that your opinion is not mine.