Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:35:02 PM
OldOllie, then riddle me this:
Why exactly would the health department of Hawaii have Obama's birth certificate, had he not born there?
Furthermore, you realize of course that a certification of live birth still requires that the person has been born where it says they have been born. They will not give you a certification of live birth document that says "Born in Hawaii" if you were born in, say, Kenya.
Sunday, May 16, 2010 11:51:42 PM
"Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome fudgeino said Friday she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama's original birth certificate." You haven`t quite gotten the knack of this reading thing, have you? I said they have the birth certificate, but I also said--and your quote confirms--that they will not tell us what it says! They will not confirm that it says Obama was born in Hawaii; they will only confirm that they have it. Also, that quote ought to tell you that the birth certificate of which they speak is a completely different document from the Certification of Live Birth, the scan of which Obama released on his web site and has been touted by liberal shills as being his birth certificate when it is no such thing.
Jeezus! My dad was right when he warned me, "Son, there are two things in this world that cannot be reasoned with: a liberal and a hardon."
Sunday, May 16, 2010 4:37:24 AM
Oldollie, this is what Fox News says, from my previous link: "Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome fudgeino said Friday she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama's original birth certificate." M`kay?
Saturday, May 15, 2010 2:12:00 PM
"Hundreds turn out to hear Sarah Palin speak at a book signing" which turned out to be footage her speaking while part of McCain's campaign. Really? That`s the worst thing you could come up with? Let`s see now, hundreds of people show up to see Sarah Palin at a book signing, and some schlub in the control room accidentally grabs a clip showing hundreds of people showing up to see Sarah Palin at a campaign event. And the nefarious intent there was...what? How did that convey anything other than the actual facts of the story?
Are you seriously comparing a completely inconsequential mistake to a deliberate pernicious fraud? Do you really think that`s equivalent to slandering a presidential candidate using forged documents in an attempt to throw an election? Or how about planting an incendiary device on a truck gas tank to create an explosion to show the truck is unsafe?
What kind of drugs are you taking that allow you to believe this crap?
Saturday, May 15, 2010 2:09:50 PM
You'd think that, by now, if there was ever a real question, I don`t know, maybe the JUSTICE DEPARTMENT would already have looked into it? You mean the Justice Dept. run by Eric Holder -- the same Eric Holder that called the Arizona immigration law unconstitutional and threatened a lawsuit against the people of Arizona even though he admitted to a congressional committed that HE NEVER EVEN READ THE F***ING BILL even though it`s only 10 PAGES LONG? Yeah, I`m sure we can count on HIM to get to the truth.