Tuesday, June 8, 2010 9:17:50 AM
how do they decide how many people are killed by second hand smoke? how could you prove a person was killed by that? how could you even say it was probable, i mean if you are around very heavy smokers than maybe, but that poos so exaggerated
Sunday, February 21, 2010 5:28:24 AM
LOL! Thanks, McGovern1981...
BTW, SmilinSam...it's "a lot", not "alot".
Also, formaldehyde is another naturally occurring byproduct of organic decomposition. That steak you just charred on your grill? It probably has more formaldehyde than a cigarette does.
Friday, February 19, 2010 11:25:06 PM
i know my statistics because my best mates dads was a higher up in the malboro's UK branch and strongly advices i smoke rolling tobacco if i choose to smoke
Friday, February 19, 2010 11:24:04 PM
just for the record, smoking rolling tobacco with a filter is healthier than premade ciggerettes the top end of prerolled ciggerette brand such as malboro or camel contain about 40% tobacco in total after all the work put in preserving and such the rest is chemicals + useless stuff that is used to make it taste nice or last longer, the lower end ciggerettes such as Lambert and butler or benson and hedges contain even less tobacco, rolling tobacco leaves you with about 70% tobacco with a hell of alot less chemicals, but for even safer get an E-ciggerette as it contains only nicotine and works out a hell of alot cheaper in the long run, aswell as beating all smoking bans and not putting anyone in danger, it is what im going to end up smoking as i currently smoke rolling tobacco, search E-ciggerette on the internet i suggest smokers invest in one