Friday, September 11, 2009 3:31:00 AM
and by the way, don11817. Prepare to be insulted (perhaps even called "2 paper clips"), repeatedly assured you are stupid, and constantly told that the debate is at an end, wether you realised it or not.
i think your argument is spot on, look forward to seeing this one pan out!
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:49:05 AM
It's probably useless to write this now cause this debate is getting old but to odeed...By "evolution" I just meant change over time not actual adaptation like humans growing wings or something (though that would be awesome) because there is a difference between the two. So I just meant that our appendixes are getting smaller because they`re not being used anymore.
Sunday, May 24, 2009 6:31:10 AM
Ok "creationists", here's the thing. Creationism is not a scientific theory because there is no compelling physical evidence (the bible is historical evidence, not physical) to support it. In fact there is a lot of evidence to suggest it`s not true. It is a debunked theory. Evolution is a very well supported scientific theory. There is positively mountains of evidence to support it. Subsequent discoveries in many other areas of science have fitted very nicely into the the theory. The chances of there being this much supportive evidence and it not being true is miniscule. Thus so many scientists believe evolution is the most likely theory for the origin of life. Come back when you`ve read "The Blind Watchmaker". If you can read that and still deny the logic please tell me who brainwashed you. I would like to get together with them and start a cult and make lots of money.