Wednesday, January 28, 2009 6:49:15 AM
I thought this article made an excellent point. It's not about the mom or dad, but the kids. Too many people get wrapped up in their own crap that they forget the real victims, those two kids.
I think the bio mom should be penalized for fraud- not her children.
As for the father, he needs to get his head of his ass and continue to support those kids. Biology is not the sole determination of fatherhood.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:27:20 PM
This just pisses me off. He wouldn't have been so close to them, or even helped raise them if she hadn`t liked and said they were his kids. If he loves the kids, and I am sure he does, then he should be given a choice to support them, and have as much visitation as he and the kids want. The lying bitch should have no say in it. I think if he loves the kids he can support them but his ex needs to pay him damages for fraud. And then face charges for filing a false claim of paternity to the province.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:38:31 AM
No I don't think so. You don`t pay for you neighbours dog too, do you? This is bs, if I was that judge I`d charge HER with fraud.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:03:20 PM
Well, I can honestly say that I'm stumped on this one. I just don`t know the answer and could go either way on it.
I`m sure that if I read through IAB comments, I`ll find some nugget of truth that will lead me to the light, but my brain hurts right now and I`m going to choose to remain ignorant.
T-Shirts
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
