Saturday, October 11, 2008 2:12:00 PM
i think the line is crossed with free speech when its a disturbance to other children in a school. especially when the kid doesn't seem old enough to realize the implication of his actions.
to me, it`s more offensive though when adults (who are supposed to look at things more objectively and maturely) advertise ignorance like that. but maybe that`s just me.
Sunday, September 28, 2008 10:02:22 AM
iceman look up rhetoric if you even come back here.. I didn't insinuate that there would be an election in 09 .. good lord whats the point in talking through this one...
It is a presumption that by 09 Obama would allow terrorist into our country based on his ethnic back ground. Saying that because Obama has Arabic ties, he would allow Arabic Terrorists into our country, which if anyone did any research would argue that point instead of freedom of speech. Also, it directly ties to the video we watched about the child.
Don`t accuse me of the most ignorant things, without understanding rhetorics, sarcasm, and jokes. Your an idiot.
Saturday, September 27, 2008 8:38:17 PM
Actually, when you walk into a federal building, some of your rights are given up. So freedom of speech doesn't me poo in a public school. Second, if it is meant to offend or mock someone, and can cause violent protest, then it can be taken into consideration.