Saturday, July 26, 2008 10:39:12 AM
3) "Scientists" in 1000 AD weren't scientists as we use the term today. They were philosophers. That`s one of the reasons why science was subjective: it used a non-experimentalist, rationalistic approach without resort to the modern scientific method.
4) Copernicus` theory of heliocentrism, as championed by Galileo, was developed in the 16th and 17th centuries. This is not 1000 years ago, your history is almost as ric*ckulous as your science.
5) "Scientists" didn`t champion heliocentrism (even Galileo recanted) because the Inquisition would gut them like a fish.
6) You`re a f*cking dumbsh*t, Oregonian is right, you are wrong, die in a fire.
I'm sure glad you sighed! Maybe it let some air out of your g*d damn head. Wait, nope. Like, woah man... 2 plus 2 could be, like, 5 man... in the FUTURE.
I`d be at 10 times the word limit if I gave you all the reasons you`re a dumbf*ck a*shole, and this isn`t even on the front page anymore, so I`ll just address one point and leave it at that.
"1000 years ago, did scientists agree that the universe revolved around the Earth?"
1) The universe doesn`t revolve around the Earth.
2) The sun (which I assume is what you meant) doesn`t revolve around the Earth.
T-Shirts
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
