I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Tesla Roadster Electric Car

submitted by: cliks
< Back Next >
Tesla Roadster Electric Car. Tesla motors present new electric car being manufactured by Lotus in England.
+ Add to Favs
Hits: 9712 | Favorites: 13 | Emailed: 8 | Rating: 3.0 | Category: Technology | Date: 03/12/2008
More Comments >

Male, 40-49, Europe
 12381 Posts
Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:42:03 PM
Having checked responses from Tesla staff to questions on their website, I see that the correct figure is 53KWh, not 58KWh. Which means that the Tesla at full power will completely drain its batteries from maximum charge of brand new batteries in 16 minutes 18 seconds.

Also, the charge time isn't necessarily 3.5 hours with the special charger - it can be up to 5 hours, depending on how warm it is in your garage. The charging generates heat. Cooling will come on if there is too much heat, but of course that takes power from the batteries and thus increase charging time.

Male, 40-49, Europe
 12381 Posts
Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:26:35 PM
Here's something to think about:

Storage capacity of the batteries - variously claimed as 53KWh and 58KWh.

Peak power output of engine - 185KW (although Tesla Motor`s website also claims over 200KW on the power graph).

Engine efficiency - claimed 95%.

So the engine is drawing 195KW at peak power output, if it is 95% efficient.

If the batteries store 58KWh when fully charged and brand new (the mazimum charge will slowly reduce as the batteries are discharged and recharged repeatly), then...

...at maximum power, the Tesla will completely drain its batteries from maximum charge in 17 minutes and 51 seconds.

Male, 13-17, Southern US
 175 Posts
Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:06:11 PM
I remember seeing this as a concept a few years back, but I never really expected them to put it into production.

Go figure.

Male, 40-49, Europe
 12381 Posts
Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:48:11 PM
I'd like to see a "well to wheel" efficiency comparison between an efficient diesel-powered (diesel car engines are 30% efficient in practice, with a 56% theoretical maximum) two-seater car carrying one person and no luggage/shopping/etc and a Tesla in various areas.

I doubt if the difference would be much. The main gain is emissions in areas where there`s a lot of electricty generated from solar/hydro/geothermal/etc.

The compressed air engine is also interesting, though not yet practical. No batteries - electricity drives a compressor which "charges" air bottles (like scuba diving kit). That makes it possible to "refuel" in minutes at a station - you`d just swap your empty bottles for full ones or even, possibly, refill using a compressed air line. That would make "refueling" the car as convenient as refuelling a petrol or diesel car and vastly better than recharging a battery car.

Male, 40-49, Europe
 12381 Posts
Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:35:26 PM
Safety is an issue too, by the way. They're extremely light, which lowers their crash rating even with the materials used. As for the statement that the 7000-odd batteries are protected like nuclear material is in transit, that`s a bit silly. Weight rules that out.

More Comments >

Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |