Friday, March 7, 2008 8:06:24 PM
^ Wars in Africa aren't smart, as demonstrated by history. The only Western power that can win a war in Africa is Erwin Rommel.
N. Korea has nukes, they would use it without hesitation.
The U.S. used nukes for a good cause. If we didn`t nuke Japan, we would`ve had to mount a land invasion and much more people would`ve died.
If you don`t think Saddam was a threat, then you`re clearly too immature and short-sighted. You think it`s a coincidence that older people tend to vote conservative and younger people liberal? Because young people tend to be immature like you and can`t foresee obvious things. Young`n`s are just too short-sighted. Sigh... They should raise the voting age to 35 or something.
Clearly, I see you left out the differences you didn`t like. Maybe you should go work for Fox News, as they love one-sided reporting like yours.
It`s good thing I don`t live in Europe. With people like you littering Europe, it`d probably turn into a totalitarian dictatorship soon.
Don't put words in my mouth, you dick. The difference between Saddam and Hitler is that hitler was a threat. He had millions of soldiers and (pay attention now) WEAPONS. He invaded Poland, France, Holland, Belgium, Russia...
Saddam had f*ck all, despite all the lies about the non-existent WMDs which were used to justify the illegal invasion of Iraq.
There are many bad dictators around the world (Kim Jong-Il of North Korea, Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe to name just a few), but Bush hasn`t seen fit to say boo to these bastards.
No oil in North Korea or Zimbabwe mate. Save your great crusade of God bullsh*t for other wankers who believe the non-existent "War on Terror" horsewank on Fox News.
And don`t even bother pulling out 9-11 in this, as that had sweet f*ck all to do with Iraq.
And finally, let`s not forget, the only country to have ever actually USED a WMD was the good ol` US of A.