I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Evolution Graffiti

Click Here to Launch:



Evolution Graffiti
(Will open in new window or tab)
submitted by: Snoogans
< Back Next >
Hits: 46443 | Favorites: 153 | Emailed: 45 | Rating: 3.4 | Category: Arts & Literature | Date: 09/30/2007
 
 popular today
Thirst Quencher [Pic] If you think that`s water, urine for a surprise.
Bad Dad Jokes [Pix] Hey kid... `pull my finger`
25 McDonalds Items You Can`t Get In The U.S. [Pix] Mozzarella sticks? Oreo ice cream cones? Beer? AMERICA, GET ON THIS.
My Back Hurts From Just Looking At This! [Gif] What I don`t understand is how people can do this but I can`t even drink a cup of water without spilling it on my boobs.
60 Real Headlines That You Won`t Believe [Pix] The truth is sometimes stranger than fiction. You can`t make this stuff up.
More Comments >

Overmann
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 3156 Posts
Friday, October 12, 2007 1:11:54 PM
Addendum: Note that my Genetics example implies only two alleles determining height. Multiple alleles will skew the probability accordingly.

Overmann
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 3156 Posts
Friday, October 12, 2007 1:08:48 PM
"...it takes much greater faith to believe in the minute chances represented by evolution."

Evolution does *not* depend on chance but rather processes that are in turn limited by other processes. We didn't *happen* to come together as we did; the processes that preceded us simply made it an inevitability.


Overmann
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 3156 Posts
Friday, October 12, 2007 1:07:09 PM
"The chance that this whole planet, whole universe was created by coincidence..."

It's convenient to think of the universe as having been developed by coincidence but it`s not strictly coincidence. Coincidence implies that the universe contains a vast range of possibilities and that we happened to form from an endless chain of accidents. This is *not* so. Every event or process the universe undergoes limits the succeeding results in a linear fashion.

[Here`s a deal. I can sufficiently demonstrate how we are the result of linear processes but it`d simply take too much room to post out here. It`s a lot of writing but if you want to hear it I`ll make the effort and write to you in PM. If you want to read my explanation I`ll write it for you but only if you agree to remain objective and docile so as not to waste my time.]


Overmann
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 3156 Posts
Friday, October 12, 2007 1:00:45 PM
"A simple example – if two tall people have a kid, that kid is very likely to be tall."

BlueAdept, please. That's not evolution, that`s genetics. If two parents are heterozygous for the genes that determine a tall or short phenotype, then theoretically 1/4 of their children will be short. Genetics is responsible for why we have variation, but it is not responsible for why there exists a wild-type of each organism, which is attributed to natural selection which *does* fall directly under the domain of evolution. You should educate yourself some more.

"That is a semi-example of Natural selection"

It`s not even "semi".

"But just because parts of evolution have validity to them does not make it wholly correct."

Agreed, except that the greater parts of evolution have not as of yet been proven false, therefore it is accepted as true. This is how science works.


Overmann
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 3156 Posts
Friday, October 12, 2007 12:56:10 PM
"And there has been no human who has existed without myelin sheaths and stop codes and such, so who is to say a perfect human wouldn't need them or at the least, have them?"

You just implied no human is perfect, which reinforces the contradiction in my previous post.

"It is a process over a long period of time that a given organism participates in that takes that organism from a state of relative simplicity to a more complex state, through things such as natural selection and mutation."

Your definition should negate why you think the complexity of the eye is incompatible with evolution. If indeed evolution is capable of transferring organisms to a higher state of complexity, why couldn`t evolution apply the same principle to the eye?


More Comments >
 


Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.