Charlie Sheen talks out about Sept 11 Conspiracies

More Comments >

Hydrotaoist Male, 18-29, Eastern US 11 Posts	Saturday, April 1, 2006 5:12:54 AM ALL of the naysayers have not answered what happend to builindg 7!!. MAYBE just maybe the two towers did callapse from the plane but building 7 WAS NOT HIT BY A PLANE. What dont you get about this? It had fire on one or two floors and just dropped out of the air. You may be able to argue that the two towers that got hit could of callapsed from the plane and fire. But building 7 was NOT HIT. EXPLAIN TO ME WHY A STEEL BUILDING CALLAPSES just from a fire on one or two floors? AS far as the other two towers go dont you think if a tower gets whacked by a MASSIVE plane on one side of the building it would TILT to the weakend side first? The top half fell STRAIT down on to the other part of the building.

TruTexasGirl Female, 18-29, Southern US 419 Posts	Saturday, April 1, 2006 2:37:56 AM charlie sheen is a whackjob

MaHaBone Male, 30-39, Eastern US 31 Posts	Friday, March 31, 2006 9:21:13 PM Sabre- If we are thinking of the same video, there are several discrepencies that lead many to believe that is not in fact Bin Laden. The Bin Laden in that tape- Is seen writing with his right hand (Bin Laden is left-handed) Is wearing a gold ring (forbidden by Islam) Looks a bit healthier and fleshier that Bin Laden usually looks. Also, there's this quote- "The US government has consistently blamed me for being behind every [attack]. I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons." - Osama bin Laden, days after 9/11/2001, from a statement to al Jazeera. Of course, its not only possible but probable that Bin Laden and Al Qaeda would put out contradictory information to create confusion. However, this man doesn`t seem quite that eager to claim credit. He also seems to have a Road Runner-like knack for evading capture, even when he comes out of hiding to check into

MaHaBone Male, 30-39, Eastern US 31 Posts	Friday, March 31, 2006 12:20:18 PM So what you are basiclly talking about is circumstantial evidence, right? Even in a trial, enough circumstantial evidence can be damning. Lets make a short list- 1. 3 hi-rises collapse spontaneously from fire, a first in human history. 2. Even the cool, steel & concrete lower floors collapsing at FREEFALL speed. 3. the black boxes don't survive, but one of the terrorist`s passports does. 4. Record numbers of put options on United and AA in the days before 9-11. 5. Bomb sniffing dogs removed from the WTC 2 weeks before the attacks. 6. The mass of eyewitness and news testimony of -multiple explosions ALL OVER the WTC, including the lobby and sublevels -the planes being non-commercial/cargo -a NYFD chief somehow weathering the "steel melting" fires on the 78th floor. -mediocre/poor hijack pilots performing virtually impossible maneuvers in 757s And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Go, research, read the anomalies. You talk about

Enohead Male, 40-49, Western US 1609 Posts	Friday, March 31, 2006 8:44:46 AM MaHa - Well, I don't really believe my "theory" - I was merely pulling a scenario out of my ass and the supporting it with "reasons" why it would happen. Which is what I think a good portion of the conspiracy theories seem to be. I admit that there are anamolies as far as how things happened vs. how you`d expect them to happen (the pentagon, the towers, etc). But that happens every day. Someone who wasn`t wearing a seatbelt will walk away from a 50 mph car crash, while someone else who WAS wearing one will die in a 30 mph crash. Does this mean the auto industry is involved in a conspiracy? No. It merely means that there a thousands and thousands of intagibles when it comes to physics.

More Comments >