Monday, February 20, 2006 10:17:46 PM
no actually einstein had a much higher iq than that and and you are just making this stuff up out of jealousy. i bet if i said i was 130 you would say einstein was 110. look, 173 is like typical advanced college placement material. shoot, a common man appeared on tv once tlaking to oprah and informed them of his iq of 163. imean i'm telling you the truth. you envious people obviously have one equal to a pothead
Saturday, December 31, 2005 1:41:25 PM
IQ means nothing. The test is fundamentally flawed -- especially when you take it on the INTARW3B. (OMG NOOOOOO!!11!!!11!) People like assnine tests far too much. I find it hilarious that we place so much emphasis on a test that measures a trait that the psychological community can't even agree upon.
By the way, an IQ of 173 is +11 standard deviations from the mean score of 100, which is just . . . fantastically idiotic. If you`re going to lie, at least make it believable.
Friday, December 30, 2005 7:04:40 PM
Personally, I thought I was gonna get more slack from the Michael Criton comment as opposed to the chemical makeup of water.
Guess that just shows that NOBODY likes Michael Criton.
I didn't think someone would so vehemently defend DHMO as being something other than water. The stupidity of our "enlightened" society really never ceases to amaze me.
Personally, I think that global warming is just a craze. I don`t think we fully understand the problem, or the planets natural mechanisms for dealing with it.
I know that humans affect climate. I`ve read about climate changes that occurred before and after the black death. I think that rather than adopting strangling legislation like the kyoto protocol, we should try and understand the mechanisms in place, and if possible, tend the earth like a garden and control the climate. That`s just my $0.02 though.