Sunday, October 9, 2005 4:47:40 AM
Saddam is such a humanitarian. The mass graves, the gassing of the Kurds in the north and using chemical weapons on the Iranians were all anomalies. Besides the UN, BJ Clinton, Saddam himself and Intelligence agencies around the world telling us he had weapons of mass destruction, why did we believe that? And why would we believe Saddam wanted to attack us? Other than him saying he wanted ta, what proof did we have?
Saturday, June 25, 2005 1:25:58 PM
america, britain and the rest were wrong to go on a pointless war to capture and destroy 'chemical` weapons that nobody ever found and so probably werent even there. All they succeeded in doing was making even more countries opposed to the US and Britain, causing more suicide bombings and unneccessary and avoidable deaths and making a huge political cover-up in Britain. That war was avoidable and led on misleading information and in the end they accomplished absolutely nothing, and there goes a report saying saddam likes Doritoes. Who gives a sh*t anyway?
Friday, June 24, 2005 8:00:34 PM
What an intelligent retort... putz. I will never move from this country because only a coward would run, because I love this country and I want it to be everything that it should be. My gripe is with our politicians not with our people.
"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." --Edward Abbey