Wednesday, August 6, 2014 9:08:19 AM
You've posted that link before. It hasn`t changed. It still isn`t what you claim it is.
You still cannot provide evidence to support your claim that when women get a ruling that different pay for different jobs (with people of each sex working in each) is anti-female sexism and get compensation for it, men also get that compensation.
If you have any evidence for your claim, tell me what it is.
If there were any women working in that job, the same applies to them - can you prove that they got the compensation that the men got? Not the new rate of pay - the compensation for previous "sexism".
I wonder how long it will be before that law gets changed so that men can`t use it.