Tuesday, July 29, 2014 8:36:57 AM
A@monkeyspankn: The keyword is: at this point in their Presidency. Yes, at the END Bush had lower numbers, but that's meaningless. It`s like saying Bush`s numbers in 2002 were MUCH HIGHER, correct? Year #5 comparison is what counts.
@Ogden: That`s what`s commonly called "a joke" ok? MSM `news` often compared Bush to ridiculous, non-political people in attempts to ridicule him. Again, at this point in their Presidency, not "all time highs or lows" which are meaningless.
Despite the MSM shilling for him 24/7? Obama`s numbers are BAD. Period!
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 3:09:55 AM
I can't stand Obama, but this is Republican propaganda. Bush had a 25% positive, 75% negative rating in 2007. You can google that, so there`s one un-truth. Obama`s 40% is a little higher than Bush`s 25%. Once again we have polls.