Lodgers With Benefits: Free Room Available To Female Only -- Conditions Apply

Submitted by: littlemissqt 1 week ago in Weird


Landlords in West of England are offering free rent in return for sex. It's illegal, but no one's stopping it.
There are 23 comments:
Male 6,708
That first guy was so gross, im mildly shocked she didn't throw up at the mere thought of it.
1
Reply
Male 44,403
Why not? If I could pay my rent by giving you the D I would.
No moral qualms about it.

But when women do the same thing she's a "victim" and men are to blame.
Discuss
0
Reply
Female 935
Gerry1of1 You know what, Gerry? I totally agree with you.

Guys who ran the ads were obviously not out to fool anyone. They were just stating the case. If they were asking for regular rent, then sexually harassing the women, I would be upset. In THIS case, though, you'd have to be pretty dense not to understand what the ad was saying.

There are plenty of places one can rent. And lots of places to live. If a woman decides she can deal with that situation, that's her business. 

What this report really is, is prudery in modern disguise. 
2
Reply
Male 2,122
Gerry1of1 well, it’s always better to give than to receive;)
0
Reply
Male 44,403
woodyville06   
Speak for yourself. 
I'm a pitcher and a catcher but that's probably more than you wanted to know.
-1
Reply
Male 8,668
In the Victorian times it would be very usual for a homeless and distressed young woman of the lower orders to find a bed in the garret of a house at the cost of being fucked now and then by her master. She would also have been required to carry out domestic tasks.For subsistence and a pittance. It was called "Service". We haven't gone quite that far back yet but we are getting there.

On reflection, in some cases maybe we have.
-1
Reply
Male 2,122
LordJim here in America we call being in the military being in the “service”.  How appropriate: subsistence, a pittance and getting fucked from time to time.  The things you learn on IAB...
0
Reply
340
she looked better without the cheesy wig and makeup
0
Reply
Male 85
As a person who supports the idea that prostitution should be legal, I don't see anything particularly morally wrong here. But this is a specific scenario. If the situation were different, for example: where a person were already a tenant and was told that she would have to put out to continue living there, then that, obviously, is wrong.

However if given free choice to pay with one's body as opposed to cash, I feel like that's something an educated consenting adult should be able to do if they wish.
2
Reply
Male 2,122
Grif_91 the issue is fair housing laws (at least in the US).  
0
Reply
Male 85
woodyville06 I would concur with that.
0
Reply
Male 17,643
In Hong Kong, a reasonable hooker costs HKD400 and a 2,000sqft apartment costs HKD100 million. In order to achieve a gross yield 5%, the tenant would have to fuck her landlord nearly 35 times a day, with no days off.
-1
Reply
Male 884
Draculya Hmm is the the prettier ones or average looking ones? I might just consider Hong Kong for my next trip.
-1
Reply
Male 9,892
Draculya HKD400

So, $50US?  Not a bad deal, if I were the type to pay for sex.  I never have (unless you count my first wife). 

But, seriously, these guys are scum.
1
Reply
Male 8,605
Draculya Not even I am that horny.
0
Reply
Male 1,210
I remember seeing quite a few similar ads last time I was hunting for a room. They weren't explicitly saying sex for rent, but basically implying it. Looking for a "companion" or whatever
0
Reply
Male 2,122
For some reason I thought the landlord would look like this.

3
Reply
Male 44,403
woodyville06 Does it matter? You're paying the rent, not having a party.
-1
Reply
Male 2,122
Gerry1of1 “what does it matter”. I don’t think she could afford to pay the rent that way.




0
Reply
Male 44,403
woodyville06 For free rent I would close my eyes and pretend it was Bill.
0
Reply
Male 2,122
Gerry1of1 as long as she doesn’t talk
0
Reply
Male 8,668
woodyville06 At 3.00, not far off.
0
Reply
Male 8,605
LordJim My thoughts exactly.
0
Reply