[Photos] Tom Sizemore Was Removed From Movie Set for Allegedly Violating 11-Year Old Girl

Submitted by: fancylad 1 week ago in Entertainment News & Politics

Tom Sizemore, alleged child molester.

The Hollywood Reporter has released an article that alleges actor Tom Sizemore touched an 11-year-old girl’s genitals on a movie set in 2003, and the report is backed by a dozen cast and crew members.

According to the repot, Sizemore, now 55, played the girl’s father in the film, which required her to sit on his lap. Sizemore allegedly stuck his hand under the girl’s nightgown and touched her genitals. The girl later told her parents, who talked to police, but did not press charges.

At the time, Sizemore denied the allegations, and was removed from the film, but was later invited back to film reshoots. The film's producer Gus Spoliansky defended inviting Sizemore back onto the film: "We had a fiduciary responsibility to complete the film so we decided to go about business as usual—lacking the evidence of what happened that day," Spoliansky told THR. "We took the allegation extremely seriously and we were willing to do anything, including dismissing Tom. We just couldn’t be police, judge and jury."
There are 16 comments:
Male 4,316
i bet he was so dooped up he wouldn't remember 
0
Reply
Male 6,224
The stupid thing about all this is that the media is just going to grow tired of doing this, and then those who weren't caught, or who the media numbed everyone's ears to the accusations and no one cares, will be rubbing their hands with glee. "now we can take our sexual perversion to even higher and more wicked levels"

Then some victim speaks out the media can say "meh everone grew tired of that when we bombarded them with that in 2017"
0
Reply
Male 15,339
monkwarrior you know what worries me more than the idea of an actor fingering an 11 year old in public till her eyes pop out of their sockets? It's people who attack victims because their "heroes" have been shamed.
0
Reply
Male 6,224
Draculya i have no heroes in the media and entertainment, in case you were wondering.

My point was far beyond what you took it as, more along the lines of this being forced to make people numb to the claims, and may actually lead to doing what you say.
0
Reply
Male 1,801
Draculya What's worse than people attacking are those dozen cast and crew members who can back up the story now but did nothing 14 years ago.
2
Reply
Male 3,879
Draculya well said, i always look twice at people who jump to these defense of pedos and molesters, like why are you sympathetic to the worst people in the history of the world?
0
Reply
Male 797
daegog there's good people on both sides =/
0
Reply
Male 4,281
I've never heard of many of these guys and I'm glad.
0
Reply
Male 650
Still waiting for Bryan Singer to get his. The man has been outed as a pedo for years. His days are numbered.

It makes me sick to think he's had so much to do with the success of the X-Men movies. Some people use that as justification for his actions somehow, but to me it just stains them. Here's a thing I love, presented to me by a villain who has forced himself on drugged up underage boys.
0
Reply
Female 26
profworm   "... Here's a thing I love, presented to me by a villain who has forced himself on drugged up underage boys."   i know what you mean.  i was a huge Jackson 5 fan (i'm old) and now i can't listen to them anymore. 
0
Reply
Male 3,664
profworm Yeah, Singer must be sweating bullets.
0
Reply
Male 177
kalron27 Or making payouts.  I can only imagine how many under the radar hush money packages are being made about now.
0
Reply
Male 3,879
WTF, that first picture is NOT Tom Sizemore, that is Michael Madsen (Mr. Blonde from reservoir dogs)

EDIT: Fancy fixed it.
0
Reply
Male 10,125
daegog ya. Tom Sizemore wasn't even in reservoir dogs.
-1
Reply
Male 21,025
holygod Sorry, technical difficulty.
0
Reply
Male 10,125
fancylad no worries. I was really bummed for a minute. I like Marsden way more than Sizemore.
-1
Reply