48-Year-Old Woman Caught On Delta Flight Giving Oral Sex To A 28-Year-Old Rando

Submitted by: fancylad 11 months ago in News & Politics Weird

Officials said the two were total strangers before boarding the plane.


There are 36 comments:
Male 5,502
1
Reply
Male 2,218
Different than breast feeding?
0
Reply
Male 1,058
Big deal, cabin crew just need to tell them to stop and that's the end of it, no harm done.
1
Reply
Male 662
Contest where very 1,000,000th customer gets to join the mile high club.  Flyers' perks.
0
Reply
Male 891
This warrants an FBI investigation?
1
Reply
Male 838
fuad119 of course it does!  Back in the 90s the Republican party spent $50M plus on Bill's BJ.  
1
Reply
Male 9,969
skeeter01 Yes, because the impeachment listed BJ as a charge. (oops, sorry, just checked...they mistakenly wrote perjury and obstruction of justice as the charges.)
2
Reply
Male 838
megrendel right... purjury for saying he didn't get that BJ, and obstruction of justice for... what exactly?  Sodomy laws?  Funny how you seem all in on the BJ investigation of Clinton, but apparently consider the Trump/Russia collusion a "nothing burger." 
1
Reply
Male 9,969
skeeter01 The difference, of course, was the Bill DID get a BJ.

But, of course, THAT is not what the investigation was about.  You remember, that whole firing of White House travel agents, the alleged misuse of FBI files, and Bill's conduct during the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit.

The BJ was only found out in that context...and he was not charged with receiving a BJ, but by lying under oath about it...which is an impeachable offense. 

Personally, what was worse that getting a BJ (which I have no problem with) was the fact that he wasted a perfectly good Gurkha Grand Reserve Cigar (that's just damn wasteful).
1
Reply
Male 2,127
megrendel I thought that Billy smokes Macanudos?
0
Reply
Male 838
megrendel maybe to you that cigar was wasted on Ms. Lewinsky, but I imagine Bill and she rather enjoyed that whole episode, so it was probably not wasted for him... but that's beside the point.  

I do remember that whole investigation - which went on for four years - started with the cattle futures thing, then went to Whitewater, then onto those other things you mentioned... and finally, when nothing of any substance was found in any of those things, they finally turned up a lie he told under oath to protect his wife's feelings.  So yeah, while lying under oath is bad and is an impeachable offense - that particular lie was hardly the big deal that it was made out to be.  I mean nobody was harmed in its telling (other than the Clintons), and no actual "justice" was obstructed.  But whatever - the republicans got their wish - they finally found something they could use to discredit the Clinton administration - and it only cost the taxpayers $79 Million (according to the site I just looked up) - so YAY republicans!  

I wonder how you republicans will feel about the precedent you set in that whole debacle?  I'm sure similarities between today's "witch-hunt" and the one the republicans conducted in the 90s are not lost on you. The only difference is that the roles are reversed... well, that and the fact that your guy is probably guilty of doing something that is actually bad.  But time will tell.
0
Reply
Male 8,979
fuad119 As the article states, it defaulted to the FBI because it was outside the jurisdiction of other law enforcement agencies. I'm sure the FBI feels they have much better things to do than investigate blowjobs.
0
Reply
Male 2,233
fuad119 yes, they want to know why there is enough room to have sex on a plane.  We can obviously fit another 6 rows of seats on that sucker.
3
Reply
62
woodyville06 You want to put seats on the 48 year old woman?
1
Reply
Male 2,233
twx of couse, you will need to sit somewhere while you wait your turn:)
0
Reply
Male 8,979
twx That was good, Twix. Keep those comments coming.

Oh, and while I'm here: May I ask you to upload an avatar? It takes just a minute and it makes it a lot easier for me to recognize who is whom. Sank chew!
1
Reply
62
squrlz4ever Better?
2
Reply
Male 8,979
twx Yes. It goes with your minimalist username. I like it. Thanks!
1
Reply
Female 6,390
Surely you can't be serious
2
Reply
Male 44,863
melcervini Yes I'm serious, and don't call me Shirley
2
Reply
Male 607
Gerry1of1 What's your vector, Victor?
1
Reply
Female 6,390
Gerry1of1 Its an entirely different kind of flying altogether
0
Reply
Male 2,548
melcervini Flying United you mean?
1
Reply
Male 6,286
2
Reply
Male 87
melcervini *chorus* it’s an entirely different kind of flying.
1
Reply
Male 44,863
melcervini Over Macho Grande ?
0
Reply
Male 9,969
Gerry1of1 I'll never be over Macho Grande.
1
Reply
Male 2,233
Gerry1of1 let’s win one for the zipper.
1
Reply
Female 6,390
Gerry1of1 I can't tell you, its *classified
0
Reply
Male 44,863
melcervini 
Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit smoking/drinking/amphetamines/sniffing glue
2
Reply
Male 9,969
Gerry1of1 The ultimate fitting quote for this should come from Airplane II: The Sequal.

Stewardess:  "When we're ready we would like to ask you to remove your eyeglasses and shoes and place your head between the knees.....Between your own knees, Father."
2
Reply
Female 6,390
Gerry1of1 Give me Hamm on 5 and hold the MAYO.
0
Reply
62
melcervini That was actually a mis-stated line.  Remember the white phone?  It was supposed to be "Hamm on white, hold the Mayo."
0
Reply
Female 6,390
twx Oooh I thought it was because Mr Hamm's call came in on line #5?  Oh no! i have to go watch the movie again! ;)
0
Reply
62
melcervini If I remember right (been several years) the call already on the white phone was the Mayo Clinic.  He wanted to put them on hold and take the call from Mr. Hamm on that same phone.  Hence the line should have read, "Hamm on White, hold the Mayo".

1
Reply
Female 6,390
twx which sounds better
0
Reply