Jimmy Kimmel Has A Plan To Save America From Trump

Submitted by: normalfreak2 1 month ago in Funny News & Politics
[Start at the 5:50 Mark for Kimmel's explanation.]

Warning: Trump supporters will be triggered -- Kimmel pretty much nails it.
There are 101 comments:
Male 527
Trump is a fucking idiot. His fans are lesser idiots. He lies and lies and lies.....
2
Reply
Male 9,766
Narcissistic Personality Disorder:
A mental disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for admiration and a lack of empathy for others. But behind this mask of ultraconfidence lies a fragile self-esteem that's vulnerable to the slightest criticism.
1
Reply
Male 3,409
1
Reply
Male 3,409
jimble kimble
2
Reply
Male 9,766
"You've been trying to ignore it because you don't want to admit to these smug annoying liberals that they were right... but deep down inside you know you made a mistake"
0
Reply
Male 941
holygod Funny you should quote that because it was the one part of the segment that jumped out at me.  It is too broad of a statement.  Not voting for Hillary was certainly not a mistake.  
-1
Reply
Male 9,766
cjeffblanchr I know. She used the wrong email account.
2
Reply
Male 941
holygod What?
1
Reply
Male 9,766
cjeffblanchr Look, I get not liking Hillary. I really do. I don't particularly like her. It sucks that those were our two options, but they were. We had to pick the lesser of two evils.

You guys put a pathologically dishonest, narcissistic, charlatan with no plan or experience, a terrifying temperament, and a tenuous grip on reality in the white house instead of a woman you didn't like. Till the day I die I will never understand that choice.
5
Reply
Male 941
holygod You don't have to understand it, but you do have to accept it, because again, people have the right to have their own opinions.  You'd have to be really ignorant to not be able to understand that it's about more than just not "liking" Hillary.  The level of corruption with her and her husband go back many years.  There's no reason to go through a list of the problems with her, though it would be a very long list.  There are other factors as well--she being part of the establishment is one more.  

Look, we obviously disagree on which of the two was the lesser of two evils.  We will never agree on it, and there's no reason to try to convince one another.  It's just now worth getting bent out of shape over it.

Trump hate seems to dominate or seep into nearly every post here on IAB.  I get that you and others just absolutely hate Trump, loathe everything he does, want him to suffer a horrible death...  fine.  It's not that I have any love for the guy, or feel the need to defend him... I think he's a horrible president.  It's just that the constant bitching gets really old.  We're stuck with him for now; why not discuss more productive things like who could run against him and win in 2020.  I don't want to be an ass, but all I'm saying is that being butthurt and repeating the same tired points over and over and over and not going to change anything at all.
1
Reply
Male 4,242
Pathetic.
Always have to go for the low-hanging fruit. 
-3
Reply
Male 3,409
dm2754 ballsacks
3
Reply
Male 9,766
dm2754 Low hanging fruit? You mean just showing him speaking and then listing the things he's done? Ya, how dare thy just tell the things he's done...
2
Reply
Male 7,832
dm2754 Wouldn't be an issue if our country didn't vote for someone who only produces low-hanging fruit.
3
Reply
Male 7,927
dm2754 Lying is lying except when it's a Conservative, that's the issue you need to grapple with.
1
Reply
Male 5,432
Want to save 12 minutes and find out how to really save your country from your corrupt government in 30s or less?

First of all, turn off your TV and this garbage that is trying to lull you into a sense of security.

Then you get out in numbers, gather by the millions at every government house across the nation, and peacefully chant 4 simple words over and over and over until it is done:

  1. death
  2. to
  3. the
  4. presidency

Then instill new governance as your forefathers are screaming from their graves for you to do.

you're welcome.
0
Reply
Male 3,409
monkwarrior hashtag too. you left that out, how can you get your message out without your hashtag
3
Reply
Male 5,432
rumham the funny part is its not needed at all
-1
Reply
Male 3,409
monkwarrior yes that is hilarious
2
Reply
Male 316
monkwarrior Say it happens, what then? Calling for destruction is easy but if there is no plan for after and how to implement it then what? Doesn't matter if you are talking physical destruction or political destruction this is at best cathartic and at worst dangerous.
2
Reply
Male 5,432
taxidriver  Grow, persist, and reach mass threshold but don't stop,  continue until either the governance has been resigned back to the people, or you can peaceably walk in to the government houses, and kindly and gently remove all governance from the nation.

Then you will need to gather the most intelligent people in your nation, those who understand the root of the movement, and have them as mediators over the people, for the purpose of putting in place a temporary governance, and also beginning the task of refining the law for the information age (where current business age laws weigh it down).

For example, many laws might be scaled back that have strangled growth in many areas over the last decades. Or laws may come about all information beneficial to humankind is to be shared and available to all people, without bias.  Perhaps even enact a law of separation of business and state, ensuring the state deals with governance.  In fact you never know, there might even be laws against excess wealth, focus people on caring for one another rather than themselves.   

Who knows, but when the nation is going down you have 2 choices:  Do nothing and face the worst, or do something and possibly divert it.  Time's-a-tickin'! there's saving time, but not if too many people are too lazy to do the most simple thing they could do - use their voice, gather, and say 4 simple words. 
0
Reply
Male 941
monkwarrior It would never work.  Not in modern times.  People are too divided.  Even if you remove politicians from the equation, there's just too much disagreement on everything.  It would result in anarchy.
2
Reply
Male 5,432
cjeffblanchr you'll never know if you never try.  But you know it will get worse if you don't.  So how would it be worse to try?  at the very least it would show the future generations that there is still hope.
0
Reply
Male 7,927
cjeffblanchr so is monkwarrior a Antifa fan?
1
Reply
Male 941
normalfreak2 That I do not know.  But the only way any group of people could ever do what is proposed is through extreme bloodshed, and it still wouldn't be effective ultimately.  Even if the government were removed and replaced, people are so divided that we'd just end up in the same boat all over again.  Violence is not an answer, peaceful protest is not going to work.  So I pretty much just think we're screwed.
0
Reply
Male 3,409
normalfreak2 no direct questions to our lord and leader... move along
2
Reply
Male 1,743
monkwarrior Anarchy. That's always boded well for every country that's toppled their government.
2
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior A self-proclaimed monk and someone who supposedly studies scripture condoning murder?  Wow.
3
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 Don't worry about it now, but I suspect in a few years you'll better comprehend language
-2
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior I'm sorry but chanting "death to the presidency" is easily interpreted as "death to the current president".
3
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 sure, if you don't comprehend language.
-2
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior So you said in a previous thread

 " i absolutely love it when people criticise and hate on me, it's like people willingly give me their energy to stand above them.. weird, but true.  They expend energy for me to take, and i can use it effectively to become better."

So "effectively becoming better" means being a condescending jerk, you're doing a good job.

So you call for "death to the presidency" -- any call for death doesn't have a tone of non-violence.

You call for millions of people to chant this mantra in front of government offices.  Millions of people chanting "DEATH".

Did you take part in the Million Man March in 1995?  
3
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01  Like i said, I suspect it will take you a few years yet.
-2
Reply
Male 3,409
monkwarrior boredwarrior
4
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior a few years for what?
3
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 like i was saying
-3
Reply
Male 3,409
monkwarrior like your mom was spraying. get it.. jajajejejej
2
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior Ok so in your opinion, where whould I start my path? Or do you think that I will get there on my own?
3
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 maybe a dictionary?
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior Yet another condescending comment -- I'm glad you use your energy to bring other people down.  That's very Christian of you.

As for a dictionary I prefer the Oxford.  What dictionary do you like to use?
2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 well get crackin'!
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior Could you please explain "well get crackin'!"  Are you telling me to crack some eggs?  That was a media slogan from the egg marketing board years ago.

2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 crack open that dictionary!
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior So yes I have my dictionary.  You haven't answered my questions though.
2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 then start studying!
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior But you still haven't answered my questions -- but then I doubt you ever will.
2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 because your problem is clear, and no further answers are required.
0
Reply
Male 4,242
lockner01 some one really needs to work on their reading comprehension. 
I'm always amazed a woman's ability to misinterpret things so massively from what was actually said.
-1
Reply
Male 1,049
dm2754 A lack of respect for women shows your true character.
3
Reply
Male 3,470
lockner01 AND im pretty sure its as illegal as fuck too lol.
3
Reply
Male 5,432
daegog it's not illegal in a free country, but in a slaved one may be.  But if that's the case then you better get moving.
-1
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior Threatening the President of the USA is a felony under the United States Code Title 18, Section 871. 

 At least according to Wikipedia.
2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 then do your duty : https://tips.fbi.gov
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior So you're admitting that it's illegal is the USA.  As you know I'm not American so how is it my duty?
1
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 you're the one who thinks it's illegal.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior Threatening the President of the USA is a felony under the United States Code Title 18, Section 871. 

2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 if you think it's illegal, do your duty
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior What do you feel my duty is?  Although I know like always you won't answer the question.
1
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 if you feel something is illegal so much that you make it a point to point out the law you feel it breaks twice, wouldn't it be your duty to report it?
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior As it's an American law and I'm not an American I don't feel it my "duty". I have never pledged allegiance to the American flag.
2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 So then it's safe to dismiss all your questions regarding it then, and since due to your insistence on demanding answers to it, can we also assume you're trolling?
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior nope not trolling.  Just pointing out that as an American what you're suggesting is illegal according to American law.  I couldn't care less if you actually acted on it.

I'm asking you questions, I'm not demanding answers -- I'm pointing out that more often than not you refuse to answer.
2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 Then it appears reading comprehension is your problem still:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. "
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior Nope -- I read that the first time you posted it.

Even though you call for a gathering of millions, every revolution needs to start with one person.  I think you should test your theory and take a large sign with "Death to the Presidency" written on it and go down to whatever major government building is nearest you. Start your chant.  Let's see what happens.

Are you happy hiding behind your keyboard or are you going to "walk the walk"?  

 
2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 you're at least 10 years behind the times, possibly 20.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior how so?
2
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 Hopefully you'll find out when you're older.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior I find it interesting that you won't answer questions but have a compulsive need to get the last word in.  And again you're making assumptions about my age.
1
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 i find it interesting that you are so sure you're right when anyone can see you have a reading comprehension issue.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior I'm fairly confident in my level of reading comprehension.  But thanks for proving my point about you're compulsive disorder.
1
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 That's really only is the case when i'm troll-eating.  But once i've gnawed it to the bone, like with rumham here, and where you're getting to, there's little to respond to except for small scraps that might begin to re-grow.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior How is this trolling.  I'm just pointing out that you can't walk away.
0
Reply
Male 5,432
Male 1,049
monkwarrior "by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community"

That's interesting because I haven't done any of those things other than one small instance where I openly admitted to it.  However personally insulting me would fit into your definition of a troll.
0
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 selective reasoning suits you.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior Not really selective.  You've personally insulted me a number of times.  There was even a thread where I extended you an "olive branch" and you refused to accept.
0
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 extending it for deceptive purposes undermines its offer.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior when you use the word "it" are you refering to my reasoning?  I'm not extending anything for deceptive purposes.  I'm out right saying that you've insulted and attacked me on a personal level.  You haven't denyed that.  I'm saying that it fits within the definition of a troll that you provided.
0
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 it should have gone without saying that 'it' was referring to your 'olive branch'.  But it's obvious through this thread what your mindset is.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior When you say things like "it should have gone without saying" you're asking people to make assumptions.  Why not just use clear language?  And I was being sincere when I offered you and "Olive branch"  You made the personal choice to not accept it.  When you say "it's obvious through this thread what your mindset is" you're making assumptions again.
0
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 i said it because that was the flow of the conversation, which you can easily scroll up to see.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior This conversation or the one where I offered you the olive branch?
0
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 As i mentioned, extending an olive branch for deceptive purposes undermines its offer.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior So how is this being deceptive:

"
lockner01 1 week ago 
monkwarrior I'm putting this here because the chance of anyone else reading this is slim-to-none so I don't know how it could be trolling.

On multiple occassions I offered an open door for dialogue on a subject that I think we have a mutual passion about; however I know we're on opposite sides of the fence.  But that's when good debates happen.

I don't understand, as a christian, and a devote one at that you wouldn't be able to accept the olive branch.  It's bizzare.  

If you want to keep this "you're a troll" "no you're a troll" thing going I'm happy to do it until I go back to teaching.  

If you want to have a serious discussion about the philosophy of religion I would be more than happy to do that -- this would be my prefered path."

0
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 as i said, extending it for deceptive purposes undermines its offer, or like the boy who cried wolf, no one can believe a liar even when they tell the truth.  Maybe when you're older.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior I was being sincere. It's your choice if you don't want to accept that.  Please give me one example of when I've lied -- you can't.  However today you admitted to falsely accusing me which is a type of lie.  So by your logic nobody here can believe what you say even when you're telling the truth.
0
Reply
Male 5,432
lockner01 if you say so.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
monkwarrior I'm glad you can recognize that.
0
Reply
Male 1,798
lockner01 You are wasting your time arguing with a total moron, with absolutely no common sense.
0
Reply
Male 1,049
whosaidwhat He's already admitted to lying and making false accusations so it doesn't matter what he says now.
0
Reply
Male 1,798
lockner01 Yeah, but watch him come in a deny it now, even if you show him the evidence.
0
Reply
Male 3,409
1
Reply
Male 5,432
rumham howdy?
1
Reply
Male 3,409
2
Reply
Male 3,470
monkwarrior i dunno about free or slave countries, I am talking about the US.

I would love to hear you in front of a judge saying.. but i didnt say death to the president, i said death to the presidency!

Then again, i think they just toss people like that into those CMUs, so no need for pesky shit like a trial.
3
Reply
Male 5,432
daegog no judge will stand against history:

 "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. "
0
Reply
Male 3,470
Problem is, I don't think any Trump lovers would ever listen to Jimmy Kimmel.

I really don't think Pence is one little bit better.
3
Reply
Male 7,927
daegog Pence is Trump with a filter.  So yea probably more dangerous.
4
Reply
2,841
normalfreak2 Give me anything over an inline government. 
2
Reply
Male 941
That was actually a little funnier than I expected.   Not the worst idea either.
1
Reply
Male 7,927
cjeffblanchr I like that he was respectful, he explained it calmly, clearly, and he has a command of the facts....You can't look at this and go "yea but", unless you want to ignore reality.
2
Reply