25 Photos From The 9/11 Attack On The Pentagon

Submitted by: normalfreak2 4 months ago in News & Politics

Maybe these photos (with airplane wreckage) will finally put an end to the Pentagon-related 9/11 conspiracies, but I doubt it.
There are 35 comments:
Male 332
The 9/11 conspiracy theorists are a fascinating case of Apophenia.  With such a historical event there are so many connections the human mind can find.
0
Reply
Male 2,491
Eight years and Obama didn't 'expose the conspiracy'?

Doubt these photos will convince those deluded enough to buy 9/11 conspiracy books and DVD's designed to keep selling them the idea that 'yet another investigation is needed'.

Show them a short comparison video of an actual controlled demolition and they'll probably deny their own senses.

Some people need to believe in conspiracies - it gives them a false sense of purpose in life.
1
Reply
Male 1,365
jaysingrimm  "Some people need to believe in conspiracies - it gives them a false sense of purpose in life."

or so the New World Order wants you to think...
0
Reply
Male 7,575
jaysingrimm Indeed sir and well stated.
0
Reply
Female 7,952
To believe this is some massive conspiracy involving thousands of people all of whom have kept totally silent since is ridiculous. apart from anything else it is FUCKING RUDE and disrespectful to those who died, those who risked their lives rescueing people. and as stupid as you can get....

3
Reply
Male 39,759
madduck The Manhattan Project had over 100,000 people working on it in dozens of cities... no one talked about it for decades.
Remember Enigma and the de-coder? Same thing, fewer people of course.
The Lusitania was lied about for over 80 years by the US and UK governments. Anyone who disagreed was attacked and marginalized. The US admitted the facts, the UK has not afaik...

On and on there are hundreds of examples of secrets kept by massive numbers of people, and of governments lying for years and decades to everyone. 

To pretend otherwise is... as stupid as you can get. :-/
-1
Reply
Male 653
5cats ignoring the fact different era with different technology i.e mass communication and internet leaks.  That it was creating weapons and not killing your own population. 

The Manhatten project was kniwn about, it spead up Russian bomb making by  over a year https://www.osti.gov/opennet/manhattan-project-history/Events/1942-1945/espionage.htm

1
Reply
Male 39,759
jayme21 'Known about' yes, because Russia had 100% infiltrated the British intelligence systems. Right up to the #2 man iirc. So anything Britain knew? Russia knew within days. And the Brits shared all their research with the USA in exchange for keeping informed...

And that still doesn't change the fact that it IS VERY possible to keep hundreds or even thousands of people quiet on secret stuff. It has been done hundreds of times, that we know about! Lolz! Maybe more in complete secrecy?
-1
Reply
Male 39,252
madduck Stop making sense!
3
Reply
Female 1,329
One of the saving graces of the airplane hitting that side of the Pentagon was that it was the side that was recently (at the time) redone to be better reinforced. If the plane had hit any of the other sides, that damage would have been much much worse. The company that my father was working for at the time had sent two or three employees to the Pentagon for a business trip (My father was working for a top security agency at the time) and they were working in that side of the Pentagon and sadly they all died. It's something my father thinks about sometimes.
3
Reply
Male 39,759
abby0315 Sorry to hear of anyone connected to the deaths that day, my condolences.

A 1 in 5 coincidence, which required some very skillful piloting to achieve... odd from a crappy jihadist pilot eh?
Just like the coincidence of the "massive response drill" which happened to be on the same day as the attacks.
And dozens of other coincidences... some of which actually are just that of course! But others...
-2
Reply
Male 39,252
Interesting Fact:.... Tin Foil Hats are actually made of Aluminium not Tin......  FYI
1
Reply
Male 1,034
1
Reply
Male 5,133
i cant see any valuable part of an airplane, except in a couple photos that are out of every context and that i can easily shoot miself in my garden.
0
Reply
Male 39,759
piperfawn Exactly. Not one of the 'ground zero' pictures has anything resembling the major parts of a massive aircraft.

Where is the tail section? Look at any crash site, what do they all have in common? The tail section survived, more or less intact. It's easily the strongest part of the plane which is why much of the avionics is kept back there...

If a large jet hit the pentagon? The tail section would still be largely intact. Where is it?
-1
Reply
Male 335
Hmmm...why no anti aircraft battery at the Pentagon with this much warning?
0
Reply
Male 39,759
mentott510 You forget the TV show The Lone Gunmen which, as the central plot of the season finale, had a passenger aircraft filled with people being remote-control flown into the Twin Towers... thwarted by the heroic efforts of the main characters of course.
No one imagined it? Hummmm.
0
Reply
Male 39,759
Bullshit photos don't address the facts of the situation, and that is that the 'official story' for the Pentagon is as believable as the Warren Report...

How convenient! A clearly labelled, undamaged and evenly centered paper label survived the fuselage being turned into plasma (Official Story)! Remarkable! Miraculous even...
0
Reply
Male 7,575
5cats I didn't know you were a 911 truther.  Just when I thought you weren't totally batshit insane, you go and prove me wrong.  Cheers.
0
Reply
Male 39,759
normalfreak2 Ah! Bullshit, blanket generalizations! The kind he swears he never makes! Just asking a question about one part of the OS makes me a 'Truther'? And you have NO answer, just attacks? Fuck you, idiot troll, back to oblivion.
0
Reply
Male 39,252
5cats Yes, debris from a crash would be so hard to believe. I mean.... when has ANY plane that crashed left debris ?  Besides every time.
2
Reply
Male 39,759
Gerry1of1 You've missed the point. :-/

And ignored how these spotless, un-burned bits of debris, are entirely different than the debris from other crashes.
How the Official (not mine! Not tinfoil!) Story says the entire plane turned to Plasma and blasted through the walls after it's wings folded up and the engines vanished...

Because in fact the engines never hit the building, so the wings must have folded up! How? No one quite knows...

AND the aircraft could not physically puncture the second reinforced layer the way it (allegedly) did unless it had turned to plasma...

Aside form that... and a few dozen other things... the OS is every bit as believable as the Warren Report!
And no, the 9/11 Report did NOT resolve the Pentagon issues. In fact it by design refused to even look at that.
0
Reply
Female 1,329
5cats Read my comment below and you'll see why the plane was damaged in the way it was.
0
Reply
Male 39,252
5cats No way to discuss anything with someone who has chosen to only see what they want and not the facts.  Your tin foil bill must be ENORMOUS
1
Reply
Male 39,759
Gerry1of1 Where is the tail section? Where are the marks/damage from the engines, each weighing 6 tons, hitting the Pentagon? Why are the debris in question not even darkened with soot? 

And why did the FBI seize all the surveillance recordings of the plane hitting?  Like the Zapruder film before the famous court case ordered it released, no one has ever seen those pictures. Except what officials 'released' of course. The twice 'leaked' video which still was edited to not show the aircraft itself.
0
Reply
Male 653
5cats well now im reevaluating any shared beliefs i have with you to double check the plausibility. I agree with Gerry you cant look at all the evidence surrounding 9/11 and the reams of debunking material objectively and still believe a conspiracy...
0
Reply
Male 39,759
jayme21 Yet the Democrats believe 'Bush Did It' and you're fine with that? 9/11 was an inside job and all the rest? :-/

If there's no conspiracy, the answers should be easy to get. Release the videos of the actual aircraft hitting the actual Pentagon. Simple as Pi.
Just like the Zapruder Film which was reported by the Official Story to show JFK's head moving back and to the left... when in fact it moved forward and to the right...

And explaining how 2x 6 ton engines moving at 400+ miles an hour didn't even make a dent... not even a broken window... yet represented roughly 1/7 of the mass of the aircraft which (somehow) punched through multiple walls of thick, reinforced concrete...
Not even a chip off the stonework. Somehow they disintegrated inside the building along with all the rest of the aircraft, yet convenient, clean pieces were ejected onto the lawn? I want to know how those things are even physically possible. (no, the Popular Mechanics article was not even remotely dealing with these issues)
0
Reply
Male 653
0
Reply
Male 653
Snopes as you didnt read the popular mechanics otherwise youd see it deals with your points 

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.asp
0
Reply
Male 653
0
Reply
Male 653
5cats This theory ignores the considerable evidence of the bodies of passengers and crew at the site which were photographed. Thousands of people saw the plane circle then fly into the Pentagon. Some quickly photographed the scene. Anyone planting plane debris at the site afterwards would surely have been seen.
0
Reply
Male 39,759
jayme21 Yes, they saw a 4 engine jet, a white jet, a quiet jet (woosh? that plane doesn't go woosh) go right past their apartment. A jet with no windows, and jets of various markings and colours.

Those were on the day of the attack. Many were broadcast live, can't erase them from history. Later? Many came forward saying they saw the proper aircraft at the proper time... after it was widely reported. :-/

I read the PM quite closely, it never touched on the things I brought up, or offered an 'explanation' that defies physics. They also showed a picture of 'proof' with the landing gear... except the gear at the Pentagon and the 'proof' they showed were DIFFERENT wheels with a different number of vent holes.
Another 'proof' was the alleged engine part... but the plane in question didn't have those engines, so where did the part from another plane come from? They then changed the story to 'it's the alt-power unit' but it's not the right size for that so...

And the aircraft turned into plasma and disintegrated the engines and nearly everything else... but the human bodies survived? They allegedly recovered nearly 100 of them? Riiiight. That is the OS btw, not tinfoil theories.
I have never once seen a picture from the Pentagon with a body, nor pictures of the recovered bodies.

Thx for the links, will look later, gtg...
0
Reply
Male 39,252
5cats You are just a few donuts short of a dozen 
1
Reply
Male 2,888
IT'S ALL PLANTED!  IT WAS A MISSILE!  I HAVE A TINFOIL HAT!
0
Reply
Male 2,718
kalron27 311 was an inside job!!! RABBLE RABBLE
0
Reply